16,396 views
Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window
No on 1 TV ad: Mom
No on 1 TV ad
Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
205 ratings
Sign in to rate
42,148 views
© 2009 YouTube, LLC
1: confuse the facts. Try to distort or change the meaning of damaging statistics. For instance, claim that male on male molestation is 'not gay'
2: when proven wrong repeatedly, try to group your opponent under a large ugly umbrella. Call them "right wingers" "nazis" or "Pat Robertson" followers to try to dismiss them outright, before their damaging arguments can be seen by people.
3: As a last resort, sit on youtube all day and flood the channel, lol
Im not a gay activist. Im just me. Ive prove you wrong repeatedly and you keep writing crap here. There are studies and professional organizations that refute your points clearly. You take a study and make a connection to sexual orientation that DOES NOT EXIST. Come on! Is this all you have?? You are laughable.
I dont dismiss it, I just prove you WRONG. Something you havent done and couldnt do because you spread lies and deceit. Thats all you do.
BTW, have you heard of the latest of the roman catholic bishops and the study the study about homosexuality and priests??
I've never quoted either one of those sources. You seem incoherent and confused again dear.
"I dont dismiss it, I just prove you WRONG. Something you havent done and couldnt do"
WHERE have you 'proved' anything? Quote yourself 'proving' a single thing, as I have done repeatedly. Try it.
Yet your "studies" and statements here appear exactly in sites like those... how interesting huh
OMG Ive proved you wrong so so so many times. Your DOJ report is a joke to your point, and now there is a brand new fresh off the oven, report that the roman catholic bishops are shitting their pants about (and you would too) because its not what they expected LOL and they spent 2 million bucks on that!! Hilarious... Look it up.
hahahah look at you.
So you are claiming that because "sites like those" quote studies, that somehow invalidates the studies themselves? lmao, again look up "logical fallacies", you are still humiliating yourself.
"Your DOJ report is a joke "
Ah yes, I bet Pat Robertson or some other boogey man must run the DOJ eh?
You people are so sadly predictable.
LOL no dumbass. The sites you get your information from quotes studies from people who have been banned from the APA or that have little to no credibility in the scientific community.
" Pat Robertson or some other boogey man must run the DOJ eh?"
Read my comment again. Your DOJ study and the link you want to INVENT is a JOKE. The DOJ study you so love mentions NOTHING about sexual orientation.
"Homosexuality no factor in abusive priests" - The Associated Press.
Quote from the artice:
"'What we are suggesting is that the idea of sexual identity be separated from the problem of sexual abuse,' said Margaret Smith of John Jay College"
chron . com / disp / story.mpl / ap / top / all / 6725667 .html
Come on, take a look at it.