The Communicators: Two Views on New Net Neutrality Rules

Gigi Sohn of Public Knowledge and Dean Garfield of the Information Technology Industry Council offer two responses to the FCC's new Net Neutrality rules. Program from Saturday, December 25, 2010.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• communicators
• C-SPAN
• cspan
• gigi sohn
• dean garfield
• net
• neutrality
• FCC
• telecommunications

[PoliticallyBlazed]

@RBEFoundation: “...I don't have time for this...”

Ah yes, quintessential wisdom when one cannot compete with FACTS. (Irrespective just moments ago, “RBEFoundation” was fully prepared to take time and show how stupid I am.)

Say it ain’t so, Bumpkins! Say it ain’t so! :D

[RBEFoundation]

@PoliticallyBlazed if it was some sort of humor, you suck at it (no offense).

You know, I don't have time for this, take care man, Happy Hew Year, best of luck with everything and most importantly, don't stay in fear :)

[PoliticallyBlazed]

@RBEFoundation: “...whole picture how 9/11 is tied up to Net Neutrality comes from 9/11...”

Yes Virginia, the core of madness and consequent products are eventually made known; clearly as a ballgame dog huckster. (Tin foil! Get your tin-foil-hats here, tin-foil! Get `um while they’re hot! Tin foil, here!)

[RBEFoundation]

@PoliticallyBlazed no, not illuminate, just bunch of greedy assholes seeking control. And no, I'm not connecting anything, FACTS ARE.

Do you agree to take the challenge of thousands of scientists? Or maybe me at computing?

If you have short term memory problems, this is not my problem but as I mentioned earlier, whole picture how 9/11 is tied up to Net Neutrality comes from 9/11 and suggesting one more time, you want facts, lets start from the hypotheses given to us by the government?

[PoliticallyBlazed]

@RBEFoundation: “Alex Jones is one of the sources...”

Ouch! I feel for ya; that blows your whole foundational argument (warned ya). You’re clearly one who wants to connect 911 as an INSIDE JOB, resulting from a vast conspiratorial (shadow government) effort to dominate liberty. (All together now... Illuminati!) So sorry, I stopped believing in boogiemen along time ago.

Ah-ya! Whatever floats your boat, Bumpkins. Good luck at that tin-foil-hat convention.

[RBEFoundation]

@PoliticallyBlazed your are not hearing me, I don't know who you are but you are not listening and doing it on purpose (I might be wrong, not claiming anything)...

Alex Jones is one of the sources, he is fixated on conspiracy alone and thinks by exposing whoever is behind will solve the problem, I'm not. There are far more problems we need to address, scientifically, not politically.

P.S. whoever is behind really afraid of Alex Jones so he is a political figure now either you like it or not.

[PoliticallyBlazed]

@RBEFoundation: “I'm wondering where your facts are coming from...”

Undoubtedly, I’ve not set-forth any FACTS other than you’ve consistently failed to provide any that support the Net Neutrality mantra. You’re fixated on this notion that 911 has something to do with Net Neutrality legislation, yet there isn’t a stitch of independent EVIDENCE to support that view.

Oh and please don’t cite Alex Jones as a credible source (hate to see you embarrass yourself, any more than you’ve already).

[RBEFoundation]

@PoliticallyBlazed "ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with what ISPs" really? now, I'm wondering where your facts are coming from because last I checked, if the government orders ISPs to do what it needs and when it needs (legally, by passing the law saying they can do it), having criminal government in power may turn out to be very bad for all of us...

Don't you think?

P.S. I didn't even touch on the matter of environmental crisis we are in! That's whole new fucking topic.

[PoliticallyBlazed]

@RBEFoundation: “You asking for facts?”

Hmmm, perhaps you’re finally getting the message.

Yes FACTS to support the Net Neutrality position would be wonderful, provided they aren’t misconnected with other matter (ahem, like 911) that have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with what ISPs may or may not do in the future.

...Proceed.

[RBEFoundation]

@PoliticallyBlazed I'm trying to provide the prove, the whole picture is made up of many facts. Lets focus on 9/11 and discuss it shall we? As a lot of what is going on right now is based based on and around 9/11.

You asking for facts?

If I'll ask you for facts of existence of "Moore's Law", you won't be able to provide any without going into details of hardware+software evolution and new discoveries in science.

So, lots of facts! Lets focus on 9/11 ok?