Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Doctrine of Original Sin

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
10,422
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 14, 2008

Is the doctrine of original sin Biblical? Mark Kielar shows that it is in this Word Pictures clip.


This is from the series called How God Converts the Human Soul. You can purchase this series at http://www.crosstv.com

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 23 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (210)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why is the guy reading in a fake British accent?

  • how is sin transmitted from one person to another if it is transgression of God's Law? Is sin a substance that can be examined? The Jews didn't believe in this false doctrine and "barmitzvah" refutes original sin because it means when one is accountable to God's commandments. The bible makes it clear that we are sinful from youth, not birth. All it is is an excuse to keep you in sin. We die physically from Adam & Eve's sin but die spiritually from our own sins. 

  • To overcome sin in the next life.? This is unbelieveable, why very few should teach. There will be no Nature to sin eternally.We will be one with our Creator in Nature. Sin will have no existence or power or nature.Sin and temptation in the next life.? Who will tempt What nature will oppose the Virtue of God We will need to be born again to overcome sin in the next life? The very first time I've heard this, incredible theology. But if you think heaven is old Adam life image I can understand

  • Adam never had fullness exactness in Image of God. Perfect, wise, righteous,image of Almighty God Adam himself, was before the fall.? Adam never carried these qualities in Image. Adam was flesh He could never carry perfect righteousness of likeness or wisdom perfect. Restored image.?We are NEVER to be restored to Adam before the fall, never.! Back into the Image of God lost.? Christ is the only exactness of Image and Christ was the only One revealing it.God's Image was Christ not Adam

  • Adam never had spiritual disease. Everything Adam had was physical. He knew Christ physically.There was no spiritual life as of yet.He knew Satan physically.Adam passed on not sin, but death from sin. All who consummate pass death from sin.Adam was flesh not a goal for believers to attain.Flesh and blood will not inherit the kingdom of God.Adam had nothing compared to what we have now in Spirit.How can I inherit Adam's spiritually dead corrupt image.? Adam was flesh with no spiritual image.

  • you see the lies in your bible writen by jews whom corrupt the bible they make god like a man walking the second lie the serpent there is no serpent at all satan who whisper to adam and eve the other lie the tree is a pradise tree and not an apple tree the other lie god to tell the serpent you will crawl and eat sand all your live did you a serpent eat sand if you want i give you more lies in the bible falsified by the jews contact me oudihmidah@yahoo.fr

  • i would punch the narrator in the face only because his dialouge sounds silly. but the stuff hes saying good. you will surely diiiiiieeee die. simply die dangit. ENGLISH!

  • @Estzenify

    Augustine's past gnostic doctrines infiltrated his fleshly knowledge and argumentation----Augustine is considered a foremost "theologian"--but never knew Greek/Hebrew, and he brought MANY new false teachings into the church. He was a debater... that's it. It's no different than an atheist turning "Christian"--yet the atheist wishes to mix evolution with Genesis 1...

    ...As for Luther, I don't need to drink the whole ocean to know it's salty. I've read enough about him.

  • @droptozro I sure do, I ll read everything I can and I really study hard, but if you tell me that Augustine was gnostic then yes he was, but his later life after his turning to Christ, hes life had nothing to do with it. I understand that people dont like some teachings that are biblical cuz darkness really does not love light and the exposing factor of it. But again why are you starting to talk about this ? Does this affirm that Luthers "BOTW" is unbiblical? Go and read it ! And stop then speak

  • @Estzenify (cont) going to read church writings, why do you start in the 1400s?... go read the Ante-Nicene fathers, Luther wrote after Augustine's semi-Gnostic writings that brought many false doctrines into the church. So.. if you're going to claim "all apostles and christians"--try reading the full history starting in the 75AD-325AD before you say things like that.

    Agreed that all have "fallen short"--but you speak for yourself if you break God's greatest commandment --see 1 John 2:3-6

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more