Zakir Naik. Proves To Athiests The Existance Of God With Proof Part 1
Top Comments
All Comments (55)
-
@crazyinsane500 hater!!
-
1--Obviously "Allah" did not give you any guidance with your English spelling. 2--Naik is an ignoramus and a liar. Anyone with a basic education in science and in the history of science knows that (the Greeks knew 100s of years before the Qur'an that the Earth wasn't flat). Naik is an embarassment for your cause.
-
@mcnesta80 Quran is formed on behalf of Dream so called SURA or WAHI of Muhammad so scripture of Quran can not be taken authenticate. It is just faith nothing else. The Dream of Muhammad is also in the CAVE not at public place , no such miracle ( like rebirth of Jesus) was seen by muhammad even he was so common and coward that he hidden himself in cave during war and a spider save him
-
@ryanfrancisdcruz Correct my Dear ! The humen is part of universe , and a part ( sub set ) can not deal total universe ( super set ) ..therefore nothing ( including Quran ) in the world is perfect. It is dream ( SURA or WAHI ) of Prophet Mohammad that cause Quran and Mohammadan.
-
We in the U.S. managed to get Kent Hovind put in prison (not for lieing unfortunately, or causing a panic, or using blatant hate speech, but for his irresponsibility with money, in an Al Capone-esque takedown) And yet this guy is still out spreading lies.
It's no wonder why people think Islam is stupid, they only have to look at this guy.
-
If existence requires a CREATOR then the universe requires a creator ....agreed!
But by the same logic.....so does God. God also cannot exist without a creator!!!! You have to agree if you are 'Logical'. :)))
-
Read the discription, thumbs up if ya think a dumbass wrote it
-
bull shit
-
Basically, this guy is judging Muhammed's scientific understanding on Europe's during the Dark Ages....
Sorry, just heard the water-cycle thing...puh-lease. All of this was known by the ancient Egyptians and Babylonians. This revisionism of the history of human knowledge is a joke. The Qu'ran is not an ancient text, it's a medieval text. Of course it contains the ancient knowledge revived in the European renaissance.
-
1. teleological argument (disproved by Hume).
2. If you read Genesis as loosely, the order of creation fits the big bang and evolution. Why not accept evolution too.
3. Humans have known about the moon being reflected light since ancient and pre-historic times. It's like saying that because medieval European villagers believed the earth was flat that Copernicus and Columbus "discovered" that the earth was round. Let's ignore Aristotle.
4. oh shit, he went for Drake instead of Copernicus lol.
so he wows the audience with his memory skills.. must be god.
RonPaulvsTyranny 3 years ago 5
There are no Versions OF Qur'an, There Are Tranlations Yes But Nor Versions. Where As The bible Has Thousnads and Thousandssssssssssss Of Different Versions, Many Majourlyyyy Revised, Many With things Taken Out and then Thrown bak In And Many With Things Totally Fabriakted And Scientifikally Proven Wrong.
The Bible Is Soooooooo Korrupted That Every Kopy Gives Warning in intro Pages Admitting To Bible having been Korrupted It Self.
JesusThe2ndComming 2 years ago 2