Warsaw Pact Countries
Uploader Comments (RusWehrmacht)
Top Comments
-
@Hillslax32 Soviet National Antherm. Seriously man.......
All Comments (159)
-
@CARMINEOWNZ were not talking about the warsaw pact were talking about today and china and india have new tanks and so does russia the ka 52 would destory the apache anyday and the type 98 chinese tank would have the dsame armor as the m1 and the qbz95 is alot more easier to kill someone than an m4 or m16 and the mi28 would destroy the cobra too the russians and their allies have stronger weapons than NATO anyday no is cheap shite put together and russia doesn't use the t55anymore
-
@shughes375 who cares? india china and russia both have shitty technology. their old tanks are nothing compared to NATO. Look at russia during ww2, you honestly think they won? they lost over 10 million soldiers to one country.
And since when were India and China in the warsaw pact?
-
@CARMINEOWNZ china has 2million men in its army near 3 and is growing russia,china and india altogether would smash nato and america together
-
10 times the men and weapons?
russia today only has 140M people
US alone has 350M today, you realize how many NATO combined has? russia, even with its iron fist on eastern europe, would eat shit.
-
@CARMINEOWNZ they had 10times the men and weapons nato ever had they would have destroyed nato FACT
-
@shughes375 too bad they had no money for large production
-
@CARMINEOWNZ the soviets had began making the T90 before the soviet union collapsed they only learned of the importance of new technology after afghanistan just like america after vietnam - F4's,huey,m16a1
-
@mily357 the myth? most warsaw pact countries were still using MiG 19-21s while NATO was beginning to use the F-16? Russia, the most powerful warsaw pact country, was using a MiG 27 in the 70s.. We didn't stand a chance vs NATO
now that being said, while poland might of had a large number of tanks and aircraft, they were so much weaker than the NATO tanks/aircraft that it wouldn't matter
It's like Albania, we had over 1000 T-59s, T-62s, and T-69s, but whats the use? an old soviet tank vs nato?
-
@CARMINEOWNZ You are wrong. During the cold war, Poland alone had enough military power to take on most of the western europe. If you include the Soviet Union and the rest of the Warsaw pact countries. NATO wouldnt stand a chance (im not taking nukes into account). Also the myth about NATO being more technologically advanced is not true.
-
@SpyWizard2 Lol none of those countries could fight West Europe alone. Poland is the only warsaw pact country that could maybe fight a weaker Western power alone. The point of the Warsaw pact was so that NATO could step all over Albania, Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Poland, and East Germany before they got to the motherland USSR.
by the way are you sure that albania was part of warsaw pact. i know that they were worst then N.Korea. they had only realtionship with SSSR, but after few years they break up
DrMisterAleksa 9 months ago
@DrMisterAleksa Yes albania was part of warsaw pact exept thier membership was very short lived
RusWehrmacht 9 months ago
why did you skip to show hungary's army
DrMisterAleksa 9 months ago
@DrMisterAleksa Sorry couldnt find any pictures back then
RusWehrmacht 9 months ago
Yugoslavia was banned from pact,because Tito yugoslav president refused Stalin request of stationing russian troops in yugoslavia
slux89 2 years ago 6
@slux89 They still had deep postivie ties
RusWehrmacht 9 months ago