Zoom-Pan video of human and chimpanzee chromosome 1 to 9.

This video shows strong inference proof of evolutionary theory by showing the similarity between human and chimpanzee chomosomes 1 through 9, in a side by side chromosome count, chromosome size, middle scale architecture, gene ordering, and fine grain DNA code structures.

Conversely, both species DNA do not resemble other species like horses, rabbits, mice, insects, plants, amoebas, bacteria, or virus DNA code architectures.

Otherwise, what does this evidence indicate? When the primate DNA architecture resembles humans, and when primate/human DNA architectures doesn't resmble other species of life? ...

That God so loved the primates, He designed man in ape's genetic image?

All of this with very few edits to chromosomes, architecture, order, patterns, and base codes? Or God planned to make a close 98% identical derivative of man when making primates, to "test us", or as a joke? The God of men, as the author of deception in nature ... sounds alot like Satan, doesn't it?

Kind arises from kind, the Bible says. This doesn't deny that God was like the monlith in the movie "2001" influencing natural evolution, or that evolution cannot happen over great time. But perhaps it shows that "man" teaches too many of their "own traditions", which is an abomination to God, Colossians 2:8, Mark 7:13, Proverbs 17:15, Proverbs 6:16-19. Lying to the flock, with 1000 year old ideas, about the "undeniable" proof of what God is truly involved with in science and biology, which is an abomination to God, "making the Word of God of none effect through your tradition", and the word of truth made void.

Video (C) copyright 2008 rubbercraft/lonerubberdragon.

Reference data may be copyright NCBI website, Entrez genome, FASTA genomic files from human and chimpanzee genome projects.

Video Errata: (0) Apologies for sound quality. (1) One phrase describing zooming into Chr. 3 and 4 at [03:00], is actually zooming into Chr. 4 and 5. (2) One phrase calling the end of chromosome 9 the shortest chromosome at [06:55], is contextually, the shortest chromosome [of the first nine chromosomes under consideration in the comparison]. (3) at 08:08 I say "the two longest chromosomes of chimpanzees and humans, one and two, fused for chimps". I should have said "the two longest chromosomes [in this comparison] of chimpanzees and humans, one and two, [with chimp Chromosome 2a and Chromosome 2b merely laid end to end] for chimps".

Upon considering the data ambiguity regarding Chr2, Fission as well as Fusion in ancient history may be the source of Human C2, or Primate C2A C2B existence today.

[KW: evolution creation human chimpanzee primate chromosome God theory evidence proof]

Category:

Education

Tags:

• evolution
• creation
• human
• chimpanzee
• primate
• chromosome
• God
• theory
• evidence
• proof

[rubbercraft]

@truthiscool That is, if the documents are cut in the same segments, arranged in the same paragraphs, and sentences, HEREDITY and INHERITANCE rule, in kind from kind. Bread processing systems have nothing to do with this. YOU DIDN'T HEAR the video. We recieved fused chromosomes from the chimp code, showing the docuement appendix merger, in chromosome 2. If not, just because my DNA resembles my so-called parents, means nothing too, NO KIND FROM KIND!? HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE, as you say???

[rubbercraft]

@truthiscool It is based on the fact that DNA is a document representing the organism. And the document is passed from organism to organism, in kind from kind. The more times the document is passed, the more it changes, with alterations like "the telpehone game". If two documents are different like mouse and man, they are distantly related. If two documents are close like human and chimp, they are related through heredity. If they are vertually identical like father son, they are family.

[mkl62]

Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny are lies and should not be allowed in God-fearing Christian homes. Proverbs 6:16-19 is proof.

[sabertooth1980]

Strike that. This is your vid. Awesome job. Keep it up.

[rubbercraft]

Well, if chimpanzee typed in nkjnkjknn-message, then that's too much monkey business to decode. Humans do IT because of fuc,king monkies ruin IT. The Beatles and The Flies, they will dine on your Kenite corrupted IntelTech remains. UR N smurt enff 2 reed. "XnTGA9dZP3dVgr%tu*inbRczLpQhb­b#39sBmZHY" ... Hamlet encode space #3,910,274,482,981,824.

[rubbercraft]

Disagreed. The black section "are likely" DNA catalytic interaction zones with digital-analog machinery. Living hot-spots of combinatorial catalytic chemistry left over from RNA world to DNA world, potential. Zones of live strong interaction, as much as the human immune system. The "brains" of DNA, that machines can only see living codes that never repeat. PCR reading is PCR reading, otherwise for all other non-interactive DNA code sequence. It ought be investigated for the importance.

[rubbercraft]

I disagree. RNA world could have led to dual boot mode DNA codes, as well as the traditional single-mode DNA. The sections are compact, and greatly transformed. If it doesn't exist to science, it should exist to design.

[rubbercraft]

I know how else to describe it, maybe a drug induced reading of their own DNA systems as best as humans can read their own code interacting with that chemical sense enhancing system? The oldest highest technology form of DNA reading of collective consciousness DNA?

[RyuDarragh]

@rubbercraft: The black sections were likely errors in the DNA reading machiney as that's still somewhat primative. Nanopore DNA Readout Chip technology coming along will simplify and make much, much faster the entire process. They use a nanopore on a multilayer substrate that is thin enough to read the resistive differences in a single base pair and pull the DNA through electrically. Sort of an artificial transcription molecule analogue.

[RyuDarragh]

@rubbercraft: I'd put some of that down to the fact that our chromosomes (all animal life) undergo gene swapping between homologous alleles. As errors creep in, some alleles have a different number of base pairs than others. No two humans will have exactly the same number of base pairs on a given chromosome, so 5 million years of divergence will likely result in shifts like that.