Upload

This video is unavailable.

Standing To Reason - Keeping An Open Mind

Jason Shankel Jason Shankel·28 videos
82

Subscription preferences

Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Working...
1,342
Like     Dislike 3

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like Jason Shankel's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike Jason Shankel's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add Jason Shankel's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Jan 13, 2008

A personal essay on the imagination and evidence-based thinking

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Video Responses

This video is a response to The faith cake

All Comments (12)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • Ramshobraja

    Brilliant video. I love how narrow minded dogmatists tell scientists to be more open minded.

    · 2

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Ramshobraja's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Ramshobraja's comment.
  • camino1ca

    Good video.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate camino1ca's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate camino1ca's comment.
  • camino1ca

    That's incorrect. The bible is true because it says it is true cannot be verified by the bible, however in the other example the evidence of it's accuracy is evident, repeatable, independently confirmable, and consistent. The truth of it's accuracy is not a claim that the germ theory itself makes, as is the case with the bible, but rather based on results.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate camino1ca's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate camino1ca's comment.
    in reply to UnBeguiled (Show the comment)
  • Skymt

    Good point, JShankel! Most inventions comes from the inventor, and not something divine!

    But your example is a bit off..

    Newton predates the formalization of chemistry, so he didn't have much else to believe in, regarding the teachings of the elements.

    But alchemy was not just a blind hunt for gold, they did discover a lot of chemical properties and reactions, and their records laid the foundation for modern chemistry...

    (But I learned this from a docu I saw online, so dont blindly trust me!)

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Skymt's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Skymt's comment.
    in reply to Jason Shankel (Show the comment)
  • UnBeguiled

    Like I said, we have the same world view, I don't have a better way.

    Imagine an organism that did not rely on sense data? We acquire and evaluate sense data, or evidence, and respond. It's what we are, that's all.

    It is the nature of an electron to have a negative charge. Humans get by in the world based on evidence. It is the nature of all living things to do so.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate UnBeguiled's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate UnBeguiled's comment.
    in reply to Jason Shankel (Show the comment)
  • UnBeguiled

    Yes, evidentialism is axiomatic for me as well. All living organisms must rely on it.

    However, citing the success of germ theory is begging the question. You're basically saying "evidence shows that using evidence leads to understanding". You can't use science to prove science.

    It's as nonsensical as saying "The bible is true because it says it's true".

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate UnBeguiled's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate UnBeguiled's comment.
    in reply to Jason Shankel (Show the comment)
  • UnBeguiled

    Nice video. We have the same world view, but many do not. For the sake of conversation:

    Why do you think an evidence based system of understanding is superior?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate UnBeguiled's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate UnBeguiled's comment.
  • Cafeeine

    Very well stated indeed.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Cafeeine's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Cafeeine's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later