Upload

Loading icon Loading...

This video is unavailable.

9/11 Physics: "You Can't Use Common Sense"

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like proudfootz's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike proudfootz's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add proudfootz's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Feb 10, 2007

Lots of links to explore here!

They say everything changed on 9/11, and they sure weren't whistling Dixie! We all learned something about physics we would never have guessed. So pay attention while the dumb-asses get schooled by Elroy P.

NIST report falls short:

http://911review.com/coverup/nist.html

LINKS: NIST versus Isaac Newton:

http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist.htm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeKOhj...

On the conservation of momentum:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkXeNa...

NIST theory proven false:

http://www.journalof911studies.com/vo...

Gravity-driven global collapse should be arrested:

http://gordonssite.tripod.com/id1.html

Bazant and NIST:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/9154

OCT 'experts' versus Newton's Laws - discussion:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/20094

Angular momentum at WTC:

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analy...

Catalog of steel samples by NIST:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/295093/NIST...

NIST physical models deeply flawed:

http://www.journalof911studies.com/vo...

NIST's FAQ examined in detail:

http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/n...

Scientist reviews OCT claims:

http://911review.com/articles/ryan/ga...

WTC fires were not all that hot:

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/...

NIST deceptions examined:

http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/k...

OCTs impeach their own 'authorities' and 'experts' when they deny freefall speeds.

NIST refers to 'freefall speeds':

"the building section above came down essentially in *free fall*... [and] the structure below... was unable to stop or even to *slow* the falling mass."

Why should OCTs suddenly change their minds about this much publicized fact?

Perhaps they know it indicates controlled demolition?

NIST's updated FAQ:

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/f...

NIST report an utter failure:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.i...

Demolition 'expert' Brent Blanchard demolished:

http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/b...

Explosions recorded on 9/11 at WTC:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wy2RoM...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2iu8q...

Sequential explosions disguise individual peaks:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQOKva...

Videos about themite at WTC:

Engineer proves thermate can cut WTC columns:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpPNRr...

Thermate cuts steel quietly:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0qnHl...

Can thermate get past secuity?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIsPBt...

Evidence keeps pouring in that arguments of would-be debunkers are simply wrong - and they knowingly put out this false information.

  • Category

  • License

    Standard YouTube License

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading...
Working...
to add this to Watch Later

Add to