9/11 Physics: "You Can't Use Common Sense"

Lots of links to explore here!

They say everything changed on 9/11, and they sure weren't whistling Dixie! We all learned something about physics we would never have guessed. So pay attention while the dumb-asses get schooled by Elroy P.

NIST report falls short:

http://911review.com/coverup/nist.html

LINKS: NIST versus Isaac Newton:

http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist.htm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeKOhjqDcI4

On the conservation of momentum:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkXeNawHFFo

NIST theory proven false:

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/TheMissingJolt7.pdf

Gravity-driven global collapse should be arrested:

http://gordonssite.tripod.com/id1.html

Bazant and NIST:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/9154

OCT 'experts' versus Newton's Laws - discussion:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/20094

Angular momentum at WTC:

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/shattering.html

Catalog of steel samples by NIST:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/295093/NIST-Mechanical-and-Metallurgical-Analysis-o...

NIST physical models deeply flawed:

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200612/NIST-WTC-Investigation.pdf

NIST's FAQ examined in detail:

http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/nist/WTC_FAQ_reply.html

Scientist reviews OCT claims:

http://911review.com/articles/ryan/garcia.html

WTC fires were not all that hot:

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html

NIST deceptions examined:

http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/kevin_ryan/newstandard.html#dislodged

OCTs impeach their own 'authorities' and 'experts' when they deny freefall speeds.

NIST refers to 'freefall speeds':

"the building section above came down essentially in *free fall*... [and] the structure below... was unable to stop or even to *slow* the falling mass."

Why should OCTs suddenly change their minds about this much publicized fact?

Perhaps they know it indicates controlled demolition?

NIST's updated FAQ:

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_12_2007.htm

NIST report an utter failure:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article15970.htm

Demolition 'expert' Brent Blanchard demolished:

http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/blanchard/index.html

Explosions recorded on 9/11 at WTC:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wy2RoMb9AAY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2iu8qk_f6s

Sequential explosions disguise individual peaks:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQOKvaYmPFQ

Videos about themite at WTC:

Engineer proves thermate can cut WTC columns:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpPNRrylH00

Thermate cuts steel quietly:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0qnHlVTaVs

Can thermate get past secuity?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIsPBtT6r50

Evidence keeps pouring in that arguments of would-be debunkers are simply wrong - and they knowingly put out this false information.

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• 911
• physics
• wtc
• gravity
• collapse
• truth
• nine
• eleven
• logic
• common
• sense
• elroy
• proudfootz
• heiwa
• anders
• bjorkman
• gordon
• ross
• graeme
• macqueene
• tony
• szamboti
• nist
• conservation
• momentum
• thermite
• thermate
• molten
• iron
• controlled
• demolition

[WilliamSeger]

15 floors fell and hit the ONE floor below it, not "85% of the rest of the building", and then 15 floors plus one floor of debris fell and hit the ONE floor below that, and so on. As pathetic as your bus analogy is in the first place, you've got it exactly backwards which was the school bus and which was the VW. I have a theory about why all the "truth movement" arguments are idiotic: You are a bunch of idiots.

[proudfootz]

@WilliamSeger

Sounds like a car accident - my sedan hit the truck's bumper and crushed it, then my car plus the bumper smashed the radiator, then my car, the bumper, and the radiator smashed the fan, and so on... until finally the whole semi was demolished and I didn't have a dent on my car.

Yup, your 'argument' is so smart!

[48mmwatch]

u gap tooth retard.

buildins doesnt fall straight down. now stop fuckin that sheep.

[proudfootz]

@48mmwatch

Aw come on! You would deny that sheep the lovin' of a lifetime?

[0vaI]

he's related to Bush somehow

[proudfootz]

@0vaI

If them egghead perfessors are right about evilution we're all cousins...

[tgsquier]

@xFogxofxWarx My question still is unanswered. Where is the sheer mass of the building and it's central support structure accounted for, and how was it reduced to dust? What explains the molten steel that didn't cool until December? How is it that NO other steel and concrete buildings have ever come down from fire or airplane strike in this same manor? Were the WTC towers unique in some way? Keep in mind they have now admitted to "pulling" WTC 7. That is a very telling point.

[tgsquier]

@xFogxofxWarx Is everything you've got from Blanchard's report? Please provide more than one source, their name, company, and shoe size...come on! College was years ago and I don't need your grade. Go take a red pen and...But if you search the internet, you would also find conflicting reports on this issue of the WTC towers. What then brings you to certainty that the collapse happened like you say when so many EXPERTS argue against this? What makes you so sure?

[tgsquier]

@xFogxofxWarx I don't remotely begin to understand the fundamentals of demolition. I also don't know any professional demolition experts. All I have been able to research has been on the internet. That is where I have seen demolition "experts" (and no I did not ask for their resumes) claiming that those buildings are controlled demos, unquestionably building 7 in particular. Are you saying that the WTC towers came down as depicted in this video?

[xFogxofxWarx]

@tgsquier Your comment lacks any understanding of the fundamentals of demolitions. Had you listened to a single demolition expert who was in fact, an expert (that meaning has extensive experience in demolishing buildings not talking about it on the internet) you would understand how horribly wrong you are from reality. Go ask the pros; they say otherwise. No demolitions industry in the world believes it was a demo.

[xFogxofxWarx]

@tgsquier He then goes further: However, because the supporting elements in a typical human-inhabited building are spread over a larger area to accommodate living and work space, they are not nearly as rigid, and the laws of gravity cause them to begin collapsing downward upon being weakened or tipped off center to a certain point. Blasters are well aware of this and often rely on this principle in designing upper-floor charge patterns to maximize breakage and in predicting debris drop zones.

[xFogxofxWarx]

@tgsquier 'With very few exceptions, a tall office building (i.e., 20+ stories) cannot be made to tip over like a tree. Reinforced concrete smokestacks and industrial towers can, due to their small footprint and inherently monolithic properties. Taken from a demolition expert's report: Brent Blanchard, working for Protec. He has extensive experience in over 1000 demolitions in over 30 countries; including EVERY demolition crew in the US.

[xFogxofxWarx]

@tgsquier Provide the name of the demolition experts; their company, and their experience please.

[tgsquier]

@Jonny4571 You know something? I so hope that what your saying is true. Please let this be sarcasm.

[tgsquier]

@xFogxofxWarx What about mass? Where does it account for the displacement of all the structural mass at the core of the building? "Ask a demolitions expert"??? Uhhh, they have...and they all say the damn buildings came down by controlled demolition. For a building to come straight down you gotta have DEMOLITION!!! Otherwise, when it is punched towards the top, it'd fall over. But where does it account for disintegration? How did it resolve into dust? Complete oblivion, really? Without help?

[tgsquier]

@xFogxofxWarx No sir, it is not hypocritical. My reply is responding to your video, wherein you sound like a prick. It is also accurate. I maintain that the whole condescending, self-righteous, arrogant tone of this video, combined with poor skills and the idea of asking us to disregard everything we know about physics so we can follow your, errrr,...thinking?...reeks of old school, home-grown, classic retardation. What you call badmouthing I say is observation. Quit sellin' it, we aint buyin'.