Farmers, Foresters and Fishermen are having their rights removed by extreme environmental laws Businesses are bankrupted, suicides often result and people are killed through these Green laws Its time to change the culture.
@deathdeminlogy Didn't you know this is what Bob Brown does on his weekends. He finds a roo, covers it in petrol and then watches it burn. Fuck there are some clueless people out there. The lack of water regeneration, grazing and not being able to make fire brakes lead to the bushfires being as terible as they were. If people had been able to graze cattle, water the area and creat fire brakes, the bushfires wouldn't have been anywhere near as tragic. Grow a brain and see past the greens bullshit
@deathdeminlogy it literally just said that lack of new water regeneration sources cause more forest fires... its not saying the Greens attacked a damn Kangaroo!
Having said that, some global warming detriments such as the melting of the polar ice caps would not been seen in regional anomalies. On CO2 we do know what it does, it is one of several gases that absorbs longwave radiation (heatwaves). And there are many papers suggesting CO2 is a driving force in our current warming see "Increases in greenhouse forcing inferred from the outgoing longwave radiation spectra of the Earth in 1970 and 1997" by John E. Harris et al.
And by the way the mediaeval warm period's temperature doesn’t actually go above today's temperatures. From the Raymond S. Bradley paper I’ve previously mentioned: "Such analyses, when scaled to the same base of reference, show that temperatures from A.D.1000-1200 (or A.D.1100- 1200) were similar to the 1902-1980 mean (-0.04ºC), but ~0.35ºC below the late 20th century (1971-2000) average (Figure 2)."
The link to the graph you gave me is returning a 404 atm but its the same graph found on this page isn't ? rockstarearth[DOT]com/science_behind_global_warming From what I'm looking at its a graph showing an increase in temperature and it doesn't show that the temperatures today were the same as they were in the 40's and 70's which was your original point correct? I've explained the Mediaeval warming period as a regional effect and not a reflection of global temperatures...
@Neuralmind What answer do you have to that graph I linked...I'd be interested in finding out. I don't particularly care about the Late Ordovician...I simply made two points. The mediaeval warming period was much hotter than today --- much much hotter...there are no detriments we can find from this heat increase. Point number 2 is that I agreed that co2 plays a part - that part is insignificant and we need to quantify what it does.
@deathdeminlogy Didn't you know this is what Bob Brown does on his weekends. He finds a roo, covers it in petrol and then watches it burn. Fuck there are some clueless people out there. The lack of water regeneration, grazing and not being able to make fire brakes lead to the bushfires being as terible as they were. If people had been able to graze cattle, water the area and creat fire brakes, the bushfires wouldn't have been anywhere near as tragic. Grow a brain and see past the greens bullshit
MrMapex2010 1 month ago
@deathdeminlogy it literally just said that lack of new water regeneration sources cause more forest fires... its not saying the Greens attacked a damn Kangaroo!
isaacbalson 6 months ago
I love the dead kangaroo at the end... what did the greens burn it?
Honestly. Grow a brain.
deathdeminlogy 6 months ago
sorry for wasting ya time- GREENS=CARNAGE. great vid , cheers.
dildomerchant 11 months ago
Great Video Mate!!!
ASPAustralia 11 months ago
oh wow, what bigoted fucks
Abe19James 1 year ago
@SirTorment Part 3
Having said that, some global warming detriments such as the melting of the polar ice caps would not been seen in regional anomalies. On CO2 we do know what it does, it is one of several gases that absorbs longwave radiation (heatwaves). And there are many papers suggesting CO2 is a driving force in our current warming see "Increases in greenhouse forcing inferred from the outgoing longwave radiation spectra of the Earth in 1970 and 1997" by John E. Harris et al.
Neuralmind 1 year ago
@SirTorment Part 2
And by the way the mediaeval warm period's temperature doesn’t actually go above today's temperatures. From the Raymond S. Bradley paper I’ve previously mentioned: "Such analyses, when scaled to the same base of reference, show that temperatures from A.D.1000-1200 (or A.D.1100- 1200) were similar to the 1902-1980 mean (-0.04ºC), but ~0.35ºC below the late 20th century (1971-2000) average (Figure 2)."
Neuralmind 1 year ago
@SirTorment Part 1
The link to the graph you gave me is returning a 404 atm but its the same graph found on this page isn't ? rockstarearth[DOT]com/science_behind_global_warming From what I'm looking at its a graph showing an increase in temperature and it doesn't show that the temperatures today were the same as they were in the 40's and 70's which was your original point correct? I've explained the Mediaeval warming period as a regional effect and not a reflection of global temperatures...
Neuralmind 1 year ago
@Neuralmind What answer do you have to that graph I linked...I'd be interested in finding out. I don't particularly care about the Late Ordovician...I simply made two points. The mediaeval warming period was much hotter than today --- much much hotter...there are no detriments we can find from this heat increase. Point number 2 is that I agreed that co2 plays a part - that part is insignificant and we need to quantify what it does.
SirTorment 1 year ago