Scriabin Etude Op.8-12

i welcome your request. write your favorite piece. // Scriabin Etude Op.8-12

Category:

Music

Tags:

• Scriabin
• Etude
• Op.8-12

[pierolivier111]

Good technique but more pratice please... there's too many mistakes.

[JZS713]

technique can be easily improved is an english phrase which means he has a lot of room for improvement. i would at least spend around 20-30 hours maybe just on technique here. and this isn't a song, it's a musical piece.

[liszt141]

For some ideas

Scriabin Etudes Op 2 No 1, Op 42 No 5

Chopin Sonata no 2 mov 3

Chopin Etude OP 10 No 6

Hope it helps

[JZS713]

lol if you think i'm being harsh on this kid because he can't play this etude like kissin you're wrong. first of all i'm not being harsh on this guy, he did a great job. all i'm saying is that he should practice more. how can anybody have anything against that? its ridiculous to argue that he doesn't have the ability to improve. I believe in him, I believe that he can improve, and I believe that he probably already has improved. Our points therefore coexist and we aren't even debating anymore

[JZS713]

yeah with respect to physics, mistake is a kinetic energy while technique is potential energy. and you think that horowitz, who has one of the best technique, doesn't make mistakes? better listen to more of his recordings then.

[mrkwonsony]

also, you're keep missing my point, which is, when you face up your limitation of your skills (technique), then you don't see any improvement of your maturity of the piece because that's your limit of your technique. Time doesn't make you to play like Evgeny Kissin or Berezovsky. There is the talent between you and the so called 1 % elite performers. You will never be the same level as 1 % elite performers as long as you don't have such talents. If you do have, then time can give you such level.

[mrkwonsony]

Wow. mistakes and techniques are two entirely different things ? They are 200% related as inversely proportional. No such great level of technique brings you so many mistakes and such great levels of technique bring you quite few mistakes. Such levels of technique can, then, be achieved by talent and time (practice), not by maturity and mistakes, as what you said, mistake is an entirely different thing from technique ?, which I am saying that's the wrong sentence. Don't change your subject.

[JZS713]

@mrkwonsony

Mistakes and technique are two entirely different things that have nothing to do with each other. Mistakes are always acceptable but technique problems simply mean you haven't practiced enough or you practice too much and developed issues such as finger pain, tendonitis, etc. seriously how do you think people like Yakov Kasman play all Prokofiev Sonatas perfectly or how Ashkenazy and Horowitz and many other great pianists play Rachmaninoff Concertos perfectly?practice and maturity

[mrkwonsony]

I do get your point but you're just not accepting my point in which I presumably have to understand maybe you just want to rationalize or whatsoever, no offence albeit. Of course something can get better if you put time into it, but just face it, even if you put time and effort, it won't bring you to certain levels of performing something like Prokofiev Sonata, or Rachmaninoff's concerto with possibly no mistakes of technique by putting more and more time into it. I won't buy even if you say so.

[JZS713]

you misread my reply. everything can be improved with time. it's not difficult, its just a matter of time. i seriously don't believe if you spent more time you can't get better on something.

[mrkwonsony]

means you can't say everything is easy to improve when especially you realize you can't improve your technique no matter how many hours you practice. It's false to say everything is easy to improve, despite the fact that it could be depending on some other factors, such as what you've mentioned here, time and effort. No matter how much effort and many hours you put into, some pieces won't get better and that's your limit when to say it's difficult to improve the piece technically.

[mrkwonsony]

There, there. That's my point you just brought up, which you look like still not get my point, albeit. You said the only major difference between people then is talent and time. Consider everyone can put as much as time available they can put into one's effort, but you can't put your talent into it in order to improve your technique no matter how many hours you put into. Do you see my point ? It's the talent that whether you say it's easy or difficult to improve in technique aspect, and that