Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

BIG 3x3 Solves

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
18,309
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 12, 2010

At naitonals, around midnight. Minutes later Andrew Kang tried to get sub-20 on it, the closest he got was a 20.6x.

Check these guys out:
Chris Bird: http://youtube.com/monkeydude1313
Chris Tran: http://wanderingflame.tumblr.com/
Anthony Brooks: http://www.speedcubing101.com/

my Stuff:
twitter: http://twitter.com/thrawst
website: http://thesixsides.com/

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Thrawst)

  • if you could solve this with one hand. I would give you the biggest hug of your life.

  • @Dunlop671 I think Waffle did it using OH Roux, he used a wall though, funny guy.

  • how fast is chris tran

  • @rubiksgh3 around 16-17

  • Hey Thrawst, how big is that LARGE cube? Any idea on the dimensions?

    AND - do you know where monkeydud1313 got this cube??

  • @jnorth51 just ask him

Top Comments

  • @Oshyrath Seriously now, you call it "Self-contained breathing apparatus" not scuba. Or perhaps some things are best left shortened.

see all

All Comments (123)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Wow a room filled with cubing gods

  • @Oshyrath Thanks, even though I don't play RCT3 anymore the name has just stuck on all my internet stuff :)

  • @Rasmus0909 How the heck did you get access to my old comment. I swear I removed it.

  • @RCT3rox Dude, I totally recognize the meaning of your username and I think it's the greatest game ever.

  • @Oshyrath Well, since the third dimension isn't defined, it technically would be.

  • @24TIMBO So, If I ordered a 18'x20' carpet, does that make it two dimensional? No it doesn't.

  • @Oshyrath Seriously now, floppy cubes are 3x3x1 not 3x3. If it was 3x3, it would just be a 2 dimensional picture. Just saying no big deal

  • @Oshyrath or it can be square drawn in marker :D

  • @Flameb97films actually, 3x3 means that it only defines 2 dimensions, the third one does still exist but it can be any quantity.

  • @Oshyrath no if it were a 3 x 3, it would be a 2 dimensional object

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more