9/11 Pentagon Explosion Victims Eyewitness Accounts

Look closely at the pictures of the explosion, you will see in frame 2 that is an explosion, not a plane crash. Frame 3 and 4 we see it is just an explosion. A large passenger plane did not hit the Pentagon. There are several clues in this video that prove a large passenger plane did not hit the Pentagon according to the official story. All the lightpoles at a 50 degree approach angle (directly above the rock bridge) are standing in this video. There is also solid evidence telling us there was a pre-planned operation already underway at the Pentagon on the morning of September 11, 2001. There is smoke machines and a secondary smoke source on the parking lot face. The windows are seen unbroken, and where there is supposed to be a plane hole we see isolated licking diffuse flame coming out of window openings. There is not any recognizable plane debris, none. Over near the heliport where the pieces of plane were recovered we see there are not any pieces there ...... yet. There was not a plane crash recovered in 4 events in 2 hours that were all one event. The odds are beyond a billion to one that four planes would disappear before your eyes in one event without leaving wings, tails, and large pieces of fuselage. The interior shear face that the plane supposedly flew into is undamaged, not even broken concrete or connections, the roof underlayment sheeting is even broke clean. only the drywall and roofing were overlapped finished building materials. The damage seen corresponds with a prestaged engineered hollywood smoke show and demolition job. There is not a plane crash here folks, move along.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• September
• 11
• 2001
• 911
• Flight
• 77
• Pentagon
• NYPD
• Port
• Authority
• Bush
• Cheney
• Clinton
• Al
• Qaeda
• Bin
• Laden
• Obama
• Pakistan
• CIA
• DOJ
• False
• Flag
• Coverup
• Commission
• Pennsylvania
• Staged
• Israel
• Taliban
• Terror
• terrorism
• Iraq
• Afghanistan
• NTSB
• British
• Construction
• Damage
• Plane
• Missile
• Demolition
• 757
• 767
• airplane
• Explosion
• Thermate
• Implosion
• Eyewitness
• Thermite
• Investigation
• Science
• Physics
• Newton
• Galileo
• Engineering
• NIST
• FOIA
• FBI

[fascistcat]

You people keep saying that this was a missile. Fine, now explain it. Here is a video of Tomahawks hitting targets ( /watch?v=8sa7ZX58Kk4 ). You'll note that it looks nothing like this liquid fuel explosion.

So, what type of missile and from where. You would have to have 20 fully fueled Scud Missiles hit simultaneously to deliver this much fuel to the impact site.

Do you think someone might have noticed a Saturn Rocket being set up across the street? How did the liquid fuel get there?

[IranContraScumDid911]

@fascistcat Whatever, where is the plane?

[IranContraScumDid911]

@fascistcat Nothing hit the Pentagon, it was a demolition and a smoke and mirrors show. You have no evidence to the contrary. In America if you do not have the evidence to prove your case it did not happen. You have no serially identified airplane parts to that tailnumber. Period.

[Masta420]

@fascistcat If you want I can PM you the link to some photo's showing the dumpster fires in front the of the Pentagon that gave off most of the black smoke seen emanating from the site after the firefighter crews had put out the original small fires caused by the explosion.

Whatever was in the dumpsters was the fuel you are seeking, so ask the U.S government for answers cause I don't think AQ flew dumpsters in and lit them on fire...

Dumpster photos are available on James Fetzer's blog too.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@Masta420 There is also fencing around it and around the trailer that was in the SE flightpath. There is also a white smoke source shooting upward at that same area, looks like a smoke machine because of velocity. The "plane" failed to crush the trees, construction trailer, cars, and spools right in front of the Pentagon, but flew right through them into the building.

[shadapple]

Why does the time stamp on the vids say Sept. 12th? It was Sept. 11th.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@shadapple probably to confuse.

[sir4ki]

no plane at all...

[Flavio12034]

This is a good footage of the flight 77, a boing 757 from American airlines, except something is missing yes the FUCKING PLANE

[repelghosts]

F.B.I. confiscated the videos...It was a missle all set up I year in advance by the Bush League...do not be fooled ,I was there.

[krs306]

16 foot hole, NO Plane that is the truth

[salaa786123]

Bush did it!

[eltzar72]

@ViolenceGaming not true

[eltzar72]

@Masta420 an explosion of that size would have left massive damage to those same dumpsters, namely it would show that an explosion had originated from within.

Snap out of it, grow up.

Conspiracy nuts, sheesh.

[eltzar72]

@IranContraScumDid911 another thing that is true in America and in the rest of the world...

Absence of video evidence of the plane impacting the Pentagon (and it did happen) does not automatically mean the default cause MUST be a conspiracy or whatever other crackpot notion you come up with.

Reality is not what you make it out to be.

Snap out of it, grow up.

[AlfaEricWashDC]

There was no plane. Please stop explaining away the obvious. In NY there was a third building that came down that day, several blocks away from the towers, ironically this third building was an Amex building for the towers! It fell, no plane, and they say bcuz of the vibration from the towers falling. Cmon people, they fed us a shit sandwich and we ate it!

[keflar5]

@fascistcat WINGS?

[scammedbygov]

Correct me if I am wrong, but I could of sworn that the pentagon attack was approximately 9.20 am instead of 9.38 am in the official story. Reason why I say this is after the 2nd tower was hit the new report at the time stated that the attacks 20 mins apart, so I had bets on the next target in 20 mins, then bingo Pentagon!

[ViolenceGaming]

no plane hit this plce....not ONE peice of frag from the plane was found AT ALL!!!