Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

ML63 VS SLK55

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
38,468
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 17, 2007

DRAG RACE FROM A STANDSTILL

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • OMG!!!! the ml63 sounds wicked! the ml flew!

  • your father or the ML?

see all

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @moretnafl69 man ML is 4x4 so from 0-60 it's better

  • slk should have beat it to 0-60 since they have 4.3-4.5 0-60 times.

  • for everybody the x6m is an SAC (sport activity coupe) not SUV, and it weights less than the 2009 porsche cayenne turbo s...although i'm really curious to see the x6m vs the 2010 turbo S

  • The Cayenne Turbo S suffers from turbo lag, making its 0-60 time 5.3 seconds. The ML63 has a naturally aspirated engine that gets it to 60 in 4.5-4.7 seconds.

  • don't comment like that within the Merc. Community

  • goliac492

    Whats about the 550bhp Cayenne Turbo S

  • err no-- 2009 model cayenne turbo s was but has been bettered now by the bmw x6 m  .

  • amaetures

  • I normally don't reply to these, but Car Enthusiast, you are an idiot. ML63 AMG is the fastest Stock SUV on the Planet. Period!!!! Know your shIt before you reply.

  • And higher centre of mass, which makes it roll in the corners.

    ML63: FAIL! :D

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more