TheAntiTerrorist on dealing with the Police Part 2 of 2
Uploader Comments (TheAntiTerrorist)
Video Responses
All Comments (453)
-
hey mate, thinkfree.ca ? i can't find this site. has it moved?
love your channel mate. seems i'm a bit late to the party though. :)
-
I think the point that the AT is making is that legislation (The AT Act) isn't Law unless you consent. So his advice applies whether the Police suspect an infringement of the AT Act or the Wearing Of Polka Dot Boxer Shorts On Pancake Tuesday Act 1864 (Amended 1972),
-
@TheGreatSpaces I'm sorry I don't have a link. The clip was part of Sky 3/Pick TVs' 'Road Wars' show here in the UK. If I come across the clip on YT I'll hook you up.
-
@lightoffuturedays what was it? Do you have a link?
-
Hard to believe i first watched this nearly 4 years ago. Is good to watch again. Hope your well Anti T
-
@leandrounifae fuk u kill all the little piggies
-
I noticed this video was uploaded in 2007..... Does this still stand?
Have the laws changed due to the terrorism?
If so it would great to get an update especially how the Police treat everyone these days.
-
I wanted to hate this video but in fact it is sensible and articulate. If I may offer one piece of constructive criticism, I felt you were a bit verbose at times.
-
Police Are Heroes !!
-
do you belive the police controle too much of our protection nowadays though? in the uk people need to take some controle of there own protection. instead of relying on the police who are (as u mentiond in priviouse videos) just looking for things to look good on paper and to make money
Recently I was watching some tacky late night 'police camera action' type show. The show featured footage of 5 or so police officers physically forcing a drunk bloke into having his photo taken/fingerprints etc. Ok the guy was pissed but the level of force used against him was fairly shocking. Am I right in thinking this was common law assault on the part of the police?
lightoffuturedays 8 months ago 2
@lightoffuturedays Indeed it was.
TheAntiTerrorist 8 months ago
Great video and very relevant info on our rights! :)
I'm a little curious on the analogy of saying nothing and staying silent... doesn't that constitute dishonor, as well as tacit agreement as there is no objection or rebuttal??
DJMattBone 2 years ago 11
If you have the right questions to hand, I always advocate asking them. They usually begin with "Am I obliged to..?" or "What law obliges me to..? Asking questions prevents any claims of dishonour but most people don't know their rights and do not care enough about them to arm themselves with the right questions. Once your rights have been reserved, tacit acceptance cannot be assumed or presumed. Otherwise, silence, after reserving your rights, is your best weapon.
TheAntiTerrorist 2 years ago 5