Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Software vs Hardware RAID

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
931 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 6, 2011

Reasons for using software RAID versus a hardware RAID setup.

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (anders94)

  • 1) I don't think "the cloud" as a means of storage will ever replace fast access to data. It might be a good backup, but if you are editing video/etc, you'll want tens of megabytes/sec. Most people don't have internet connections that can touch that.

    2) All raid is software. Even "hardware raid" is just software on dedicated microcontrollers. I would therefore change the term "hardware raid" to "proprietary raid". I think you said it best on your more recent video, call it what it is. :-)

  • @linagee Yep, good points.

see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @windcrest77 When your raid 1 fails, which drive has the good copy? You might say the software should detect this, but what if the computer was powered down incorrectly or you had a voltage spike and not sure which is the good copy? That is why an algorithmic raid such as RAID 5 is superior. If you like entire mirror copies, consider a three drive RAID 1 (mirror). This is only possible with linux software raid as far as I know. (Commercial vendors would restrict you from doing this.)

  • My goal of using RAID is redundency over space and speed. So RAID 1 is appealing and theoretically the most easy to recover from with least headaches. When a drive crashes (and they do) you want to have less stress not more.

  • Thanks for this clear explanation, I have been struggling with this decision for a small home theater machine where I want to have a RAID 1 volume. I am going to consider using the quick easy Windows 7 Pro RAID 1 because I know a drive can be removed and read on another machine as a single drive to be easily re-imaged or simply reused in emergency. If proprietary hardware is writing my files this may not be the case. I'm using SATA III so it should still be plenty fast.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more