Uploader Comments (kingscrusher)
All Comments (24)
-
I think it is about how to handle complexity :
1. Do I know the choices? (focus on king safety, pawn structure)
2. Am I capable of using them (do I know? .. how to handle an isolatied pawn)
3. How do I chose my priorities!! " I believe ideally on my own strengths and the weaknesses of the opponent (research research work work work)
Generaisations are useful cause they reduce uncertanty (fear) but cost flexibility
In psychology is an area called "complex problem solving" author =D. Doerner
-
I want to thank you from my heart for taching me so much. You are the best there is, and i wish you all success in your life.it is so nice that you promote your friends , it shows what a good hearted person you are . God bless you and your family, always.
Michel
-
At 5:33 if G6 was played, it was mate for white no matter what black did. Lucky Kasparov that Anand din't see it
-
I enjoyed the overall concept of the vid that "it all depends" and "be flexible" and really learned from that. However, and I say this with tongue in cheek, that I very much doubt that a man of Kasparov's brilliance vs. a fellow World Champion, that he "winged it" by "taking a chance" opening up the h-file and "see what happens". ;) I believe he had a tactical and even a psychological reason for doing so, and to maybe play some misdirection to try to get into Anand's head. Great vid as usual!
-
Why at about 3:30 does white play f4 instead of Bxf6 because black can't take back with the bishop because of the weakness on d6.. Wouldn't that doubled pawn there after castling and the bad bishop be an advantage for white already?
-
I don't think anyone will dispute that it all depends on the position, although it is good to have some knowledge of positional trumps which are usually beneficial (outpost squares, open files, active pieces, passed pawns, etc.). Obviously, the stronger the player, the less generalisations will be made and the more the position will be uniquely assessed.
-
An excellent question raised in this video Kingscrusher. I found a great appropriate quote from Reti "we recognize now what we propose later to set forth in detail, namely, that all principles correspond with such simple types as in reality hardly ever occur in their pure form. It is not possible to deal with a complicated position according ro several principles because the latter often will be found to conflict with each other in their respective application."
-
BH4 really does keep the position hanging by a thread. Maybe this was a well prepared line by kasparov because you would have to be incredibly brave to play such a dangerous line in a rapid play game without constantly being aware of the single saving resources available.
-
Yeah thats right. Got excited at a quick glimpse of the decoy sac but quickly ruled out after a correct look lol.
Was it just me? or was anyone else CRUSHED to see that Anand missed that G6 move @5:20 anfer Kasparov played F5 ¿¿?? Great sacrifice, it was perfectly sound, but I guess time pressure was getting to Anand.
xxbulletproof1xx 3 years ago
No it wasn't that clear because of Bh4 - offering a piece back. Then White's strongest according to Rybka is the weird looking Rd4.
kingscrusher 3 years ago
sorry it doesn't work, my mistake.
KNIGHTSTALE22 3 years ago
I guess it doesn't work because of Qxd6 and Qxg6...
kingscrusher 3 years ago
At 5:20 - checking again
kingscrusher 3 years ago