So you think you know evil?
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (127)
-
@kmsoileau You've been fully and comprehensively answered in plain english several times. You perisist asking inane questions and always fail to comprehend the answers when given. Thus you are an idiot, an attention seeking troll-like ignoramus. The only thing I've surrendered at is trying to get an idiot to think outside of his god box. You havent a clue what an atheist is (despite having it spelled out to you). You are an utter waste of time. To prevent further wastage though, you're blocked.
-
@kmsoileau Why say "You're an idiot?" Everybody knows that whenever someone says this during a debate, it's tantamount to surrender.
-
@kmsoileau There is no devil. Its a childish image created by man. There are no burning lakes for fire....its all man invented imagery. I feel sorry for you that you believe such childishness.
-
@kmsoileau What makes you think that not believing in a god means that I should suddenly want to run around causing mayhem? We have evolved to be social creatures, its part of the reason why we survive as a species. We enjoy the freedoms life offers and the company of others. Just because I don't believe a god created any of it has zero bearing on my personal wants, needs or actions. Acting anti socially is bad for the group...and the group will ultimately make that person pay.
-
@kmsoileau To put it another way...I don't care whether you subjectively / objectively think something is right or wrong...the simple facts are...if you set fire to my house, I aint gonna like that...so I'll do my best to see that you are punished for it. And I'll come and talk to you every visiting day and we can spend the time philosophising over whether you were right or wrong to commit arson. The fact is, you will be in jail, and while you are there you won't be causing grief for others.
-
You can discuss the philosophy of whats right or wrong subjectively or objectively till the cows come home. The fact is - if you act badly (in ways society deems badly) you will likely pay a price at some point for that because you are most likely screwing with the lives of others adversely. You hopefully won't be allowed to get away with it if caught and I'm quite happy to let you sit in jail philosophising all day long whether you were objectively right or wrong to set fire to my house.
-
(part 2) The only logical inference is that your definition of morality is logically "flawed," to borrow your term in an earlier post.
It was interesting watching you cling to your atheist talking points, regurgitating many irrelevant but familiar tropes betwixt the occasional vile insult. It's ironic that your main premise has been how dumb my questions were, when in fact you were laboring under the stupidity of a false concept of morality all along.
-
(Part 1) By your definition, repeated multiple times in our discourse, atheism is wicked. Why? Because the human-invented morality has never held it to be morally good behavior. This is because a vast authority of virtually all societies have held atheism to be morally wrong. So by your definition, atheism is immoral. Therefore, by your definition, belief in god is moral. But you don't believe in god. So your "definition" has led to a utterly absurd contradiction.
-
@kalsolarUK "not need god to recognize that they are detrimental to the lives of others" They may not care that they are detrimental to the lives of others. Why should an atheist care? Who are you to tell an atheist that he/she SHOULD care?
-
@kalsolarUK So if some atheist says, "you can stuff your morality and your empathy. I am going to find happiness at the expense of others, and who are you to say I'm wrong?" How would you answer such a declaration?
14 inches past six XD
leander24 3 years ago 7
"You think God loves YOUR ass? think again, gay man.. sharpen up and recall this."
So you can speak on behalf of God? Mighty impressive display of arrogance there. Your bible says God loves everyone, so shove it.
"Wisdom is Love and the bunch of you here are fuckin backward jerks with not a bone of care in the lot of ya... pathetic.."
Yes, because education and religiocity on average in populations of countries are proportional. Oh wait! No, they're not. They are negatively proportional. Lulz.
smaakjeks 3 years ago 6