THE IRREDUCIBLE COMPLEXITY OF ORGANS (More Creationist Lies)
Uploader Comments (DrMontague)
Top Comments
-
If this guy were true, eyes either work, or don't. Then what about color blindness? What about people who are nearsighted or farsighted? Who the hell is this moron who obviously can't see beyond his script?
-
Ok now here's one for you Dr M., an eye needs many different parts which all need to be there at the same time to work. Although you are easily forgetting that evolution was a SLOW process which was slowly altering all genetic material for many years. This means the eye would evolve and gain new pieces slowly, the fully working eye didn't just appear on an eyeless animal.
Video Responses
All Comments (82)
-
@ian9toes I can say with confidence.. If you don't believe in evolution, you simply don't understand it. Almost every biological discovery in the last 100 years has been because of our understanding of evolution.
-
@ian9toes You need to research evolutionary theory of the eye as it is as clear that as the noonday sun that you haven't done any serious research in this field. Research authoritative websites and keep away from the creationists websites who set out to lie and deceive.
-
@isgoanrain Have a think about what you just said . First you say the eye needs many different parts to be there at the SAME TIME to work. Then you say they would've evolved slowly over many years. Why would natural selection select a half finished eye that is completely useless. The different kinds of eyes are not gradual enough. It's like taking a steam engine and assuming a worker making random errors could end up with an internal combustion engine. Evolution is pseudoscience.
-
@HEC01 Huh? Can you rephrase that?
-
@atchisrj1 excuse me, creationist scared of evolution? so what are you saying, that nothjing is impossible with evolution? That you guys are forcing ID advocates disprove so-stories of evolution? and then criticize ID proponents for not having enough imagination?
-
[satire]
Ow boy! Evolution is WRONG! Wow, the eye, the quotes of Darwin, it all adds up. This guy is right for the full 100%!!!! Get it peer reviewed and receive your noble price!
[/satire]
Well, this guy actually never actually did the research. And is misquoting Darwin, I suggest this guy, read on! Please! Although I think that disproving evolution would get you a noble price, why hasn't anybody done it? Go to the scientists, let they see this nonsense for what it really is. And discard it.
Why are so many Creationists scared of Evolution? Evolution could be the how as opposed to the why. If you want to believe that a creator started everything and then let nature do it's thing, that would still allow for a creator. I'm an non-theist, I have no problem with a person having faith I have a problem with a person disregarding good science in favor of religion.
atchisrj1 1 year ago
@atchisrj1 Evolution shows the holy scriptures to be wrong about their version of the creation. The bible is meant to be the word of god. If it's wrong then the whole notion of there being a creator is discredited. So god is either a liar, a piss poor communicator who couldn't get a job at a call centre, or doesn't exist.
DrMontague 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This guy truly is a crappy moderator.
There are cameras and even eyes in nature (i.e. of hawks) which are far better than human eyes. plus, not so well developed eyes of course CAN function! Also Darwin is quouted incompletely. All the classic errors of creationism in one vid, nice job! The techno music in the backround gives it all an ironic touch, though.
Funaru 3 years ago
They deliberately misquote Darwin because they are lying creationist scumbags.
DrMontague 3 years ago