Proof Obama Will NOT Veto NDAA 1031 Bill that can Indefinitely Detain Americans!

Section 1031 co-sponsor Sen. Carl Levin says that Obama was the one who called for the removal of language from the bill that would've protected American citizens from section 1031.

• Category

  News & Politics

[venuecam]

Signing statements are NOT laws. I hope everyone of you Americans wakes up and defends your constitution cos Kim Kardasdhian aint going to save you when your house is raided by Nazi, I mean U.S. troops cos you will be powerless to do anything with 10 pistols and 15 M16s at your head for downloading Justin Bieber's latest single for free.

Sad.

[Blue74gurl]

I think you need to get your head out of your butt and look at that bill a little closer and open your ears. Look at what Nazi Germany and the US now has in common. Not just in Obamass but Bushass time too.

[mockingbird187]

Obama "dislikes" this video being up here.

[Kicker001911]

I wrote Karl on this and he said " I would never vote for a bill that allowed Americans to be arrested without due process. I sent him a link to this video and I never heard back from him. He knows he got busted. We are watching Mr. Levin... A lot of us are watching and were taking notes on traitors

[IGOTTHESHAKESBAD]

Nazis ? Nazis are going to raid your house, you stupid dumb shit ? It's the communists who will raid your house you dumb asshole.

[xEAxConfederateJoe]

U.S. troops wont go for that.

[egalowitsch]

she`s got a fat black bear, I`would likr to look at here fat black pussie bear!

[verlouria]

That's the problem, officials are trying to say that the text does not clearly state these things. However, you have a president who comes forward and says, "Yes this can be used for that, but I promise as long as I am president that won't happen." So, apparently they do know the law can be used in the ways stated in the video. The wording was made to confuse people, but make no mistake its there. Obama will use it, because he lies about most everything. Transparency anyone?

[verlouria]

Do what? Look past the color of his skin. No, most voted for him, because he would represented "change" and not just because he was a democrat, but because he was black. He would be the first black president after the "evil and dumb" Republican George Bush left office. Democrats knew they throw a black or a woman in that position they would "physically" represent change not just by being Democrat. So, the votes would pour in. Majority of people voted for "the change."