9-11 Overview Part 1a
Uploader Comments (galendenzen)
All Comments (6)
-
@jschrempp then look at the overwhelming evidence: A 2 year study done in Copenhagen that found unexploded advance engineered aluminothermic explosives in the dust, the 1100 missing bodies, 40k body parts, no real investigation, pulverized concrete, disassembled superstructures, Explosions heard by witnesses, the very short period the towers stood (56&102min) The 99 day underground fires that would not go out, WTC7's implosion, etc
Please go to 911research.wtc7 net
-
This video is excellent, and I hope it gets a lot of people intrigued. And though this intro may not yet convince people, they should continue on to watch the next ones to learn more. While I seriously can't understand how anyone can feel the official theory to be true once they look into it, I'd caution you to be respectful to people commenting and keep your cool, so people coming into these videos will take you as seriously and see that you as the balanced man that you are. Fantastic video.
-
Dennis, no need for the ad hominem attack. I'm just saying that I watched your video and your arguments didn't convince me.
I've also read a lot of the other 9-11 conspiracy sites and I just find the official story to be more believable; incredible yes, but more believable than the conspiracy. Point by point the official story is most likely.
Jim
Sorry Dennis, this one didn't compel me to belief in a conspiracy. I'll watch the next ones.
jschrempp 3 years ago
Jim, are you really this clueless?! You already believe in a "conspiracy theory", the one promoted by the USG and MSM which just happens to be physically IMPOSSIBLE!
What's your problem? Are you really incapable of independent thought or are you just pretending?
For truth -- Dennis
galendenzen 3 years ago
Question #2 What about Dennis Kusinage?
mt3355 3 years ago
Good question. Dennis Kucinich has had very little to say about 9-11 even though he knows the truth.
galendenzen 3 years ago