Blitzkrieg Allied Intro

Intro video for Allied campaigns in Blitzkrieg.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Blitzkrieg
• CDV
• Allies
• Britain
• Norway
• France
• Africa
• WWII
• RTT
• British
• Army
• 1940

[RackJacket]

Really?

The British sure did a good job of beating the axies in north africa when they were outnumbered and were against superior weapons and equipment, That played a part only where it made a difference, fact is the British gave the Africa Korps a complete bashing when the AK couldnt put their superior weapons to use

Your comment makes you look dumb, dont make the same mistake again

[Zefurion1988]

Russians showed true heroism(even tough pushed brutally by Stalin)

Im not russian but i respect the sacrefices made by these people.

The only reason communisam as a whole is in a bad light is because of Stalin.

You see i was raised in Ex-yugoslavia and can asure you that most of the evil soviet myths are incorrect (I might be wrong about outside ex yugoslavia)

[EEEL123]

@1MagicAndMayhem1 And, by the way, even if you were right abut most of the British tanks being away from battle, (and I don't think you are), it would mean that the British could re-equip their forces while Rommel, who rarely received reinforcements from Hitler, had to take his losses and grimace.

[EEEL123]

@1MagicAndMayhem1

And I never said that Rommel's tanks were mostly Italian.

[EEEL123]

@1MagicAndMayhem1

I quote from Basil Liddell Hart's 'History of the Second World War': "While the British armour had been brought up to a total of 160 tanks (of which nearly half were Grants), he [Rommel] had barely 60 German tanks (of which a quarter were light Panzer IIs) and a handful of Italian tanks." This is at the height of Rommel's success, several days prior to the First Battle of El Alamein, not after he was smashed up during the battle.

[1MagicAndMayhem1]

@EEEL123 No, Sorry but your wrong, Having the tanks in the active theater doesnt mean they played apart in a battle, being often miles and miles away, Which would mean all the difference between being able to use them and not, Something you obviously dont understand, Rommel was plagued by incompetant staff time and time again, And sorry, His forces were not made up of mostly Italian armour, The majority of Italys forces were already smashed by the battle of El Alamein

[EEEL123]

@1MagicAndMayhem1

Rommel acutally had inferior forces. For example, when Rommel was checked at the First Battle of El Alamein, the British had a 50% advantage in manpower, 200% advantage in aircraft and 150% advantage in tanks (not to mention the vastly inferior quality of the Italian tanks). While on occasion Rommel had more men, at every stage he had fewer tanks and aircraft, which were more important.

[FrozenPetrolPie]

Actually, the Second World War was chiefly a Russian/German war. About 50 million people died in the war, half of them where Russian. From 1941 to 1945 about 75-80% of all German armed forces were fighting on the eastern front.

America gets the credit only for defeating Japan. Russia gets the rest of the credits. Sure GB helped, but the role they played was limited.

Inb4: I’m a non-communist from Sweden

[MGGoblin]

Instead of having Great Britain, this should have the United States.

[kawazaki23]

there is no difference between allied and axis both of them wanted to conquer the world

[Mayo2411]

@yaik7a i meant blitzkrieg 2..fail..lol

[Mayo2411]

@yaik7ano it says i dont have enough libraries installed, it says..and when i do it says error..but ill try waht u said to do...lol