Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Addio, Fiorito Asil CAGE MATCH: Gigli vs Pavarotti

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,435
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 18, 2008

Part three of the Addio, Fiorito Asil Cage Match series. I thinks these two singers of had two of the most naturally beautiful lyric tenor voices in recorded history. Although they are a generation apart, I find this match pretty even. Enjoy!

1. Beniamino Gigli, 1940
2. Luciano Pavarotti, 1974

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Gigli age 50 and Pav age 39. Bit of a difference..

  • We are blessed to have had all of these great voices: Caruso, Gigli, Bjoprling, Corelli, DelMonaco, "Pavarotti, Domingo....Let us just revel in what they have given us and stop pitting one against the other. It's like comparing apples abd orabges.

see all

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The big difference are :recording epoch, age, and above all the Orchestra, definitely the Orchestra is much more  good in Pavarotti redemption.

  • one can habitually hear an old gigli recording and not be 100% positive who the singer is - this NEVER happens when hearing Pav - is such distinctness of sound necessarily a good thing? And is it likely that one may not be as certain w/ Gigli because the recording technique in his day was so inferior as to eliminate sounds that make a voice unique? How can anyone ever compare caruso/gigli vs bjoerling/corelli/Pav when the playing field (i.e. recording technique) is so categorically different?

  • it's odd,but I don't remember making that comment. I don't know how I let that go through with the typos, but I agree with what I said.

  • @MsRuthes I agree, but the order is: Caruso first, Gigli, Bjoerling, Corelli and the rest.

    All dilettatanti should learn to taste them all, enjoying them to the full and put them in that order, otherwise, there is

    a problem with their taste.

  • The tempi in the 1974 Butterfly are in general very very slow, and the orchestra generally very loud; such was van Karajan. Pavarotti generally sang in a very protected, careful way on this recording, and, one might say, covering his passagio more than usual. It is certainly a different sound than he employed on the Boheme recording he did only a year or two before. It's not his best role, to my ear, but he sings well otherwise through the recording.

  • @premiereopera1 You sure you mean "cover" so much as modifies the vowel on an F?

  • Gigli by far over Pavarotti, both here and in anything I have heard. Pav "covers" the F's much too much, taking away all the tenorial thrill, IMO, and is boring.

  • THEY BOTH HAVE VERY BEAUTIFUL VOICES AND WE R FORTUNATE TO HAVE THEM

  • PAVAROTTI of course!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more