Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

홍산문명은 고대국가였다. 고고학자의 충격소식

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
15,273
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 31, 2010

5000년전에 이만한 신전을 구축했던 세력의 엄청남에 놀랐다.
(紅山文明) - 한민족(東夷族) 참역사

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 역시 시작은만주야

  • 옥이나 진흙 모양은 문자를 표현한 것일 수도 있습니다. 

  • "unprofessional people's words" lol... Gina L. Barnes is a professor... Archaeology of East Asia, state formation, geoarchaeology, rice agriculture... Bloomsland is talking smack. Barnes academic statement, among many others, is way more reliable than Chinese propaganda.

  • @bloomsland

    EArlest taiji is from sweden??? I think its a celtic symbol. The Taiji is probably taken from Roman influenced. BTW, go tell any Koreans if Taegeuk is Chinese. They will laugh and they will also laugh that Ginseng is Chinese too. ^___^ BTW, I went to Chinese Ginseng store and I told the employee about Ginseng originated from Korea and he agrees, He also says that the best Ginseng is grown in Korea-Manchuria area and the original Ginseng was from there. ^____^ stupid chink.

  • @asadal123 Dear Korean brother, I would like to tell you that the eldest taiji now in collected in sweden -Östasiatiska Museet.If you have any chance to be there to visit this musem and ask them this pattern is Koreans or Chinese?

    I just desire to say that,in 21th century the world will be more cosmopolitan!We should be convinced that Chinese ,Japan and Korea are sharing the same Asian civilization.Japanese also convinced taiji is tradditional Chinese pattern....farewell good luck korean

  • @bloomsland

    Of course, the Hongshan people were mainly of tusgunic race, tell me, is Chinese tusgunic or speak un-tonal language?

  • @bloomsland

    Tell me, is referring to archeleogy journals distorting? Yes or No? Is China distorting our history by claiming such bullshit WITHOUT ANY ARCHELEOGICAL AND HISTORICAL EVIDENCE?

  • @bloomsland

    First of all, Honghshan is not a PATHWAY to Yangshao. Why does real archeleogy research anger you chinese? Even Chinese admit that Hongshan HAVE nothing to do with Yellow river cultures. Hongshan culture was mainly settlers, and early Koreans were also settlers, not nomadic. Even Chinese books detail where Gojoseon located, hence basins of Liao river. ^____^

  • @bloomsland

    1. Confucious is Chinese, no Korean would say its Korean, dumbass.

    2. "The taegeuk design dates back to the 7th century in Korea but recent excavations go back even further. The design like two entangled tadpoles is not found before the 11th century in China. This shows that the taegeuk design and thought were utilized earlier in Korea than in China. " BTW, Taegeuk was used in ancient Korea, not China. China stole it from celts or roman influences. ^____^

    3. Han characters? dunno

  • @asadal123 just by using wikipedia can help you...by the way I am wondering Kongzi 孔子 is Chinese or Korean?and Taiji Bagua太極 is origin from where?and Who invent Han character汉字?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more