"unprofessional people's words" lol... Gina L. Barnes is a professor... Archaeology of East Asia, state formation, geoarchaeology, rice agriculture... Bloomsland is talking smack. Barnes academic statement, among many others, is way more reliable than Chinese propaganda.
EArlest taiji is from sweden??? I think its a celtic symbol. The Taiji is probably taken from Roman influenced. BTW, go tell any Koreans if Taegeuk is Chinese. They will laugh and they will also laugh that Ginseng is Chinese too. ^___^ BTW, I went to Chinese Ginseng store and I told the employee about Ginseng originated from Korea and he agrees, He also says that the best Ginseng is grown in Korea-Manchuria area and the original Ginseng was from there. ^____^ stupid chink.
@asadal123 Dear Korean brother, I would like to tell you that the eldest taiji now in collected in sweden -Östasiatiska Museet.If you have any chance to be there to visit this musem and ask them this pattern is Koreans or Chinese?
I just desire to say that,in 21th century the world will be more cosmopolitan!We should be convinced that Chinese ,Japan and Korea are sharing the same Asian civilization.Japanese also convinced taiji is tradditional Chinese pattern....farewell good luck korean
Tell me, is referring to archeleogy journals distorting? Yes or No? Is China distorting our history by claiming such bullshit WITHOUT ANY ARCHELEOGICAL AND HISTORICAL EVIDENCE?
First of all, Honghshan is not a PATHWAY to Yangshao. Why does real archeleogy research anger you chinese? Even Chinese admit that Hongshan HAVE nothing to do with Yellow river cultures. Hongshan culture was mainly settlers, and early Koreans were also settlers, not nomadic. Even Chinese books detail where Gojoseon located, hence basins of Liao river. ^____^
1. Confucious is Chinese, no Korean would say its Korean, dumbass.
2. "The taegeuk design dates back to the 7th century in Korea but recent excavations go back even further. The design like two entangled tadpoles is not found before the 11th century in China. This shows that the taegeuk design and thought were utilized earlier in Korea than in China. " BTW, Taegeuk was used in ancient Korea, not China. China stole it from celts or roman influences. ^____^
@asadal123 just by using wikipedia can help you...by the way I am wondering Kongzi 孔子 is Chinese or Korean?and Taiji Bagua太極 is origin from where?and Who invent Han character汉字?
역시 시작은만주야
TheYangchan 6 months ago
옥이나 진흙 모양은 문자를 표현한 것일 수도 있습니다.
daesabuzzang 6 months ago
"unprofessional people's words" lol... Gina L. Barnes is a professor... Archaeology of East Asia, state formation, geoarchaeology, rice agriculture... Bloomsland is talking smack. Barnes academic statement, among many others, is way more reliable than Chinese propaganda.
icchiism 8 months ago
@bloomsland
EArlest taiji is from sweden??? I think its a celtic symbol. The Taiji is probably taken from Roman influenced. BTW, go tell any Koreans if Taegeuk is Chinese. They will laugh and they will also laugh that Ginseng is Chinese too. ^___^ BTW, I went to Chinese Ginseng store and I told the employee about Ginseng originated from Korea and he agrees, He also says that the best Ginseng is grown in Korea-Manchuria area and the original Ginseng was from there. ^____^ stupid chink.
asadal123 11 months ago
@asadal123 Dear Korean brother, I would like to tell you that the eldest taiji now in collected in sweden -Östasiatiska Museet.If you have any chance to be there to visit this musem and ask them this pattern is Koreans or Chinese?
I just desire to say that,in 21th century the world will be more cosmopolitan!We should be convinced that Chinese ,Japan and Korea are sharing the same Asian civilization.Japanese also convinced taiji is tradditional Chinese pattern....farewell good luck korean
bloomsland 11 months ago
@bloomsland
Of course, the Hongshan people were mainly of tusgunic race, tell me, is Chinese tusgunic or speak un-tonal language?
asadal123 11 months ago
@bloomsland
Tell me, is referring to archeleogy journals distorting? Yes or No? Is China distorting our history by claiming such bullshit WITHOUT ANY ARCHELEOGICAL AND HISTORICAL EVIDENCE?
asadal123 11 months ago
@bloomsland
First of all, Honghshan is not a PATHWAY to Yangshao. Why does real archeleogy research anger you chinese? Even Chinese admit that Hongshan HAVE nothing to do with Yellow river cultures. Hongshan culture was mainly settlers, and early Koreans were also settlers, not nomadic. Even Chinese books detail where Gojoseon located, hence basins of Liao river. ^____^
asadal123 11 months ago
@bloomsland
1. Confucious is Chinese, no Korean would say its Korean, dumbass.
2. "The taegeuk design dates back to the 7th century in Korea but recent excavations go back even further. The design like two entangled tadpoles is not found before the 11th century in China. This shows that the taegeuk design and thought were utilized earlier in Korea than in China. " BTW, Taegeuk was used in ancient Korea, not China. China stole it from celts or roman influences. ^____^
3. Han characters? dunno
asadal123 11 months ago
@asadal123 just by using wikipedia can help you...by the way I am wondering Kongzi 孔子 is Chinese or Korean?and Taiji Bagua太極 is origin from where?and Who invent Han character汉字?
bloomsland 11 months ago