BachmannEvolution
Top Comments
All Comments (134)
-
@PaulLovesGod I guess ignorance makes trying to discredit something a lot easier. Since you obviously know nothing about Evolutionary Theory, or the Scientific Method whatsoever you can sit smug in your chair and proudly proclaim that you want the youth of America to be just as ignorant as you. Intelligent Design is a religious plug and completely false. It has absolutely no data to back up it's position, can not make any predictions, and does not fit with any empirical evidence.
-
For the best way to watch this insane hag, turn on the snowflakes. Imagine they're zyclon b dust.
You're welcome
-
Bachmann says "If I understood the logic..."
Logic must give Bachmann a nasty rash, because she avoids it whenever possible.
-
"Intelligent design" is a far more intelligent and reasonable assumption than "it all just happened to come together like this by serendipitous natural selection" Darwinism!
I'm for teaching creationism ONLY. Belief in evolution as explanation for how we got here is totally absurd--and credible only to someone who refuses to admit mankind's inevitable future accountability to the Creator! But, denial will not delay the inevitable judgment to come.
-
MICHELLE BACHMANN & RICK PERRY - DO NOT EVER HAVE CHILDREN TOGETHER. EVER.
-
O my goodness! Its torture really...to just try to sit through her argument and listen to what she has to say. She really goes on to prove that democracy is lesser of all bad systems of governance.
-
America deserves better than these spectacularly ignorant clowns.
-
Breaking news at 11: SCIENCE CAN CHANGE!!! What's that? You mean people can actually learn new things and from mistakes? Find out more!
As for unanimity, I'm pretty sure that not all Christians agree on interpretations of the Bible either Bachmann
-
BACHMANN, READ, DO: GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS.
ID isn't a theory. In more than 20 years of Intelligent Design "research", they managed to present a testable hypothesis about once. And it was falsified. It was demonstrated that intellignet design was not detectable in natural objects. It has also been shown that every single item they used to call "irreducibly complex" was fully evolvable by natural, unguided processes. They have nothing but an agenda to get sectarian religion taught as science. The game is over. ID is politics, not science.
blackwolf1200 3 months ago 29
Stork theory versus Conception theory
teach the controversy
MustaphaJones 3 months ago 23