Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Environmental and Resource Economics (by George Reisman)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
922 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 21, 2011

More videos about the environment and natural resources at: http://vforvoluntary.com/the-environment-and-natural-resources

Edited from: http://mises.org/media/1508/Environmental-and-Resource-Economics (Mises University 2005)

LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE - CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION 3.0

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Video Responses

This video is a response to Milton Friedman - Our Limited Resources
see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @stealthswimmer Carbon credits are not free markets. Government mandates to pay for human actiity are not free markets. Government edict to regulate your life in a way that they seem fit in contrary to freedom and free markets, and obviously liberty.

  • lol, yes the price system conveys information. The problem is that right now our prices are NOT reflecting all the costs! I felt the beginning of the vid was great but he just then is saying environmentalists are all those extreme ones he's talking about, and he's just being extreme on the other end, lol. The end is just wave after wave of what many have begun to call vulgar libertarianism - arguing as if our current system was a free market(when he says we don't need to worry cus of prices)

  • Individuals who do stuff that leads to global warming, they can be held responsible for those actions....it just turns out that all of us do stuff that contributes to it. That's one reason why some folks promote the carbon tax. You're internalizing the social cost, or if you don't like that term, you're internalizing the externality. Free markets internalize as much as possible, but our market is hampered by government regulations that produce suboptimal results in many cases.

  • Not considering extinction of an arbitrary species, even if not viewed as tragedy, means ignoring the environmental consequences, which affects the wealth we have (because it affects what we can harvest from the environment). That's just not good economics. I'm a fan of this guy's lectures I've heard but that right there I disagree with. This can lead you to some very wrong conclusions (and I believe Reisman has made some here)

  • Very good. Reisman should be speaking more often ;)

  • Well said.

  • Very interesting speech. A perspective on the environment which I have not thought about before.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more