John Stossel defends Rand Paul and business right to discriminate

On Fox News, 5/20/2010

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Think
• Progress
• John
• Stossel
• Civil
• Rights
• Act
• Rand
• Paul
• Megyn
• Kelly

[nataslived999]

If you don't believe what Stossel is saying just remember Rosa Parks and the bus boycotts. Eventually businesses will have to not discriminate, or will go out of business to others who don't discriminate. If there is a demand, somebody will step in and supply.

[mooninquirer]

This blonde babe needs to shut her trap, because she herself is a beneficiary of discrimination ! ( Oh wait --- her producers have ordered her to take this "principled" stance against the "evil" of discrimination ! ) John Stossel rightfully alludes to this and rubs it in, by saying that if a business does not want to hire BLONDES that is their right.  But the fact is, that brunettes, and especially fat and ugly women and men were discriminated against so that SHE could have her job !

[Personmr]

race quotas are racist. what could be more racist than saying that you can only run a business if you activly pay attention to and document the races of your employees. furthermore it makes employers view minorities as lawsutes waiting to happen. we should stop paying attention to what race we or another person is and just focus on how somone acts and their past experiences.

[mooninquirer]

@knearhood8 The Jim Crow laws were passed over the objection of businesses. NO ONE wants their own rights to be taken away. For the businesses that intended to be racist, it deprived them of the personal satisfaction of doing so themselves. It no fun to be racist, if you are required to be racist ! And they couldn't get a unique niche market either, of providing an all White establishment.

[mooninquirer]

When the Democrats controlled the House, the Jewish ADL pushed a bill that would mandate even private schools to hire transsexual and transvestite teachers for elementary school, even if they openly advocate that lifefstyle every day. It would also require ALL religious institutions to hire transgendered ( the only exception was made for the position of minister ), and it would require everyone to allow transgendered ( in the process of "transitioning " ) men to use the women's bathroom.

[mooninquirer]

When the Democrats controlled the House, the Jewish ADL was able to have the House consider a proposed bill making it ILLEGAL for dating sites to discriminate against gays. E-harmony, for example, only deals with heterosexuals. ( Never mind the fact that there ARE dating services EXCLUSIVELY for gays ! ). Also, categories such as "Men seeking women" would be illegal, because they violate the civil rights of the transgendered. This proposal was shot down.

[mooninquirer]

This blonde babe is quite obviously NOT passionate about what she is saying, and obviously does not believe it. In other words, she agrees with Rand Paul and John Stossel. And why not ? As a gorgeous woman, she herself has been the beneficiary of discrimination all the time, AND she would certainly wish to RETAIN her own right to discriminate in selecting the men she wants to have sex with ( i.e., the right to turn men away ). This right is actually being chipped away, believe it or not !

[mooninquirer]

@mooninquirer But if any business asserted his rights too strongly ( in opposing the passage of the Jim Crow laws ), his business would be burned down by the KKK. Business owners did lobby for the Southern state legislatures to pass the Jim Crow laws, but poor Whites, Freemasons, the KKK, and Jewish BANKERS who lobbied for them. This is actually obvious, but it is also stated in "The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, volume TWO"

[Averyofthemain]

@crownborn like all masturbatory government hacks, your argument against stossel is just breathtaking.

[knearhood8]

I think a lot of people miss the point of the Jim Crow laws in the first place. They were there to mandate racism because, even in the deep south, even in that time, businesses who discriminated would be at a financial disadvantage to those who did not. That is how all those laws came about, Businessmen who wanted to be racist, but did not want the competition.