Predicting 9 11 (2001) in 1991

TV interview of Michael Fjetland during Gulf War (1991) as Mideast expert, discussing his book in which the plot involved a terrorist attack on the U.S. This was two years before the first bomb attack on the WTC (in 1993).

Fjetland want on to become Fox 26 terrorism analyst on and after 9/11. He is currently President of Armor Glass International, Inc., which installs a hurricane/burglar/bomb-rated window film - the same that was installed in DC after 9/11. www.ArmorGlass.com
Stay up on current global events on MIchael's new radio program "The Global American" at www.GlobalAmerican.org
Click "Favorite Programs" on Egypt to Commercial Space
Sign up for Global American news to keep you informed of global events that impact your life at:
www.GlobalAmerican.org
And "Friend" us at
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Global-American/365009967820

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Gulf War
• Gadhafi
• Saddam Hussein
• Michael Fjetland

[Dokkasan]

how ironic, theyre talking about possible terrorist targets, while sitting in front of what looks like a side view picture of the twin towers

[dramvids]

Wow, he predicted that Saddam would attack Washington! Uncanny, except that it was Washington that attacked Saddam. Well, he almost got it right.

[MrMister212]

@autopsy87 thats what i was gonna say. you must have predicted what i was gonna say you are a phsycic

[autopsy87]

crazy how similar the talker looks like Jeffrey Dahmer

[mcgrawaddict]

I mean seriously ..Saddam Hussain attacking houston oil refineries ??? WTF and people seriously bought this bullshit. 

[MrHerbicat]

Only a scumbag shithead would upload this trash and only a Texan would still be dressed on 1976 attire in 1991.

[videosfromderelix]

@xD1CE Makes even less sense, my response to his comment was much more than a complaint about grammar. You know what grammar means right? Pointing out that his comment was a jumbled mess of nonsense has nothing to do with grammar.

To your first question, I chose not to argue with his actual rant because it would be pointless. For one, it was pretty obvious he is either very uneducated or just trolling for the lulz, making it a waste of time to attempt debate.

[xD1CE]

@videosfromderelix Actually, I wasn't talking about MrJesusishere's comment. I was talking about your response to EVILIMPERIALISM23's comment. I could care less about what he said, I was merely wondering why you had to resort to insulting his grammar skills (or lack thereof) as some sort of supplement to your argument. We all know grammar takes a backseat on the internet.

[izzynobre]

@Dokkasan that's not whay "irony" means.

[Smulborn]

VOTE THIS UP WHEN YOU'VE READ IT AND AGREE!

Ok, I sat my GCSE sociology paper last year. Within the opening pages there was an image, of a boy and a girl. The girl was building 2 towers of letter blocks and the boy was flying a (toy) plane above them - there's lots more, but I can't explain it all now. Its all broken-down into a video:

/watch?v=qSgc5Apu6DU&feature=c­hannel_video_title

Get this known, facebook, twitter. Let everyone know how fucked our education system really is!

[donovan93123]

Dance to Illuminati:

/watch?v=cF1D7fDRbQ0

[xXxTHRETxXx]

@WOLVESDEN66 Its just the boogeyman they need to control people