Bill O'Reilly uses bogus facts to shup up a guest

Shortly before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, Bill O'Reilly was busy promoting the war as did just about everyone else at Fox News. Here, he uses wild "intelligence" claims to defeat a very sensible argument from Miami Herald Columnist Robert Steinback who says that the case for the immediacy of the Iraq threat has not been made. Bill O'"Reilly shoots him down with a "what if?"

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Bill
• O'Reilly
• Fox
• News
• Iraq
• War
• Invasion
• Weapons
• Mass
• Destruction
• WMD

[jgestiot]

@leafsfan9917 What if you are a child molester? What if you are a potential murderer? What if you are a dick wasting everyone's time here? oh, I did not accuse you of anything, I just said "what if"....

[xbinix]

Media talks some truth and some bullshit but O'reilly, he just talks crap, hurts people, makes people angry and is just a plain idiot.

[Dan474834]

Richard Dawkins, one of the most intelligent people on Earth nowadays, said O'Reilly should be fired. I agree.

[jgestiot]

@MrGreenPoop1000 Rubbish. There was more evidence against the presence of WMDs in Iraq than anything that suggested Saddam might have some. People like you try to rewrite history a long time after the event. There were books published by experts proving that if Saddam had any WMDs they were useless.

[MrGreenPoop1000]

@jgestiot Saddam Hussein was a murderer. Good riddance to him.

[MrGreenPoop1000]

@jgestiot Various Intelligence agencies outside of the U.S. believed there were WMD's in Iraq. Based upon that, they invaded.

There's no crime.

[seanymo]

@leafsfan9917 i am with you. The intelligence was saying that there was an imminent threat to america. Therefore it seemed the smart thing to do was attack first. If someone has cancer and the doctor believes there is a chance of it spreading and become a fatal condition the doctor would operate and remove the cancer. Pre emptive measures are aimed at neutralising the situation with the intelligence at hand before the situation gets out of control and irreversible.

[erik4727]

SHUP UP!

[jaffey2006]

@leafsfan9917 hahaha damn dude you got fucking owned

[jaffey2006]

@leafsfan9917 hahaha damn dude you got fucking owned

[humparepatta]

@leafsfan9917 haha you gotto stop watching Don Cherry, he has no clue about world politics and no he never won a Stanley cup either although he had one of the greatest defensemen in Bobby Orr, why? cause he's a bone head

[maggosh]

@JustinLB82 No, no, see, that argument's invalid. Don Cherry is enjoyable and entertaining. O'Reilly is a fascist liar who should have never become a journalist.