Flight 175 reconstruction of final 4 mins 40 secs.
Loading...
Uploader Comments (skyarcher)
Top Comments
-
Flight11 and Flight175 could NOT fly at cruise speed at sea-level.
Don´t let debunkers ever brush off this argument again.
Please watch and spread.
watch?v=KdjgtBj_HwM
2 years ago 5
-
excellent video skyarcher!!!!!
BRAVO, BRAVO, BRAVO!!!!
1 year ago 3
All Comments (112)
-
The robot talking sound makes me understand your an idiot...
-
it is not a 747 ....
-
I read that 360 kts was the VMO for a 767 and 350 kts for a 757 but maybe it is the other way round
-
@skyarcher I watched something to do with Silkair 185 and it said that even in the dive, the plane stayed intact until it exceeded the speed of sound, when parts of the wings and tail broke off
-
@Stealth9331 Where do I mention missiles in this video?
I watched you video on flight 93. I have used all the available data to recreate flight 175 you have used nothing in your video. Nothing.
-
Uhh I saw it on tv. DUMBASS
-
EVERYBODY KNOWS That on 9/11 the laws pf gravity & physics did not apply.
-
Explain!
-
Oh really? Sorry, knew that before!
-
@Ackworth97 Ha ha nice one Mirkon..you are a legend)
- 10:49
Was Extra Equipment Attached To Flight 175? (The plane that struck the south Twin Tower on 9/11)by 911NLP630,876 views
- 0:09
WTC Impacts - WTC2 Flight 175 Approach Zoom Stabilisedby femr237,982 views
- 13:59
Flight 175 - As The World Watched (Part 1 of 3)by Gideon5248085,327 views
- 2:47
WTC MISSILE STRIKE 911: United Airlines Flight 175 Impossible Speed...by Funfisique172,794 views
- 0:56
Proof Pentagon 9/11 planes can fly low and fastby trevpickering277,686 views
- 8:30
UA175 - the last 12 secondsby achimspok11,726 views
- 2:06
Tarom Inccident a/c YR-LCA ROT381 Airbus 310-325 (Paris, Orly) 3D Flight Reconstructionby aviatiaro19,464 views
- 4:42
[NEW] United Airlines Flight 175 ATC Recordings 9/11by FLT1118,379 views
- 0:18
9/11 Second Impact (Flight 175) Base of the North Towerby chrysaor91123,724 views
- 4:30
100% proof of 911 Deception. The Killer casts no shadow.by skyarcher6,397 views
- 0:30
9/11 Second Impact (Flight 175) NBC - Live - Better Qualityby chrysaor91192,170 views
- 2:23
Flight 175 Flightpath: There's more than oneby ZZUnderground5,560 views
- 1:19
Flight 175 'debris' & No ✈ Witnessby muckletoon8,129 views
- 0:27
wtc 9/11 2nd plane flight path and statue of liberty nist foiaby zenoist22,377 views
- 5:01
9/11: Total Proof No Planes Hit The Buildings!by YouTubReptilian296,270 views
- 1:05
somewhat visible Dive Bomber (allegedly Flight 175)by apocalypsynch3,109 views
- 0:47
2nd plane in view for 25 secondsby CTV911294,912 views
- 6:06
911 'PLANES'. Newton's laws of Motion. R.I.P 1687-2001by skyarcher5,771 views
- 0:33
Ghostflight United Airlines 175by HolographicUniverse329,085 views
Sorry, but completly unsupported by facts. You wrote: "Vmo + 10% around 405 ktas plane breaks up 12,000 feet and 15 miles from WTC." ?? Nonsense!! You just make that up? Based on Vmo!?! Why not look up the certification history, and the demonstrated Vd. (Hint...it's 420 knots!). Yes, the airplane CAN achieve 420KCAS. Was demonstrated for FAA. And, no....it didn't "fall apart", or flutter. You think they'd certify an airplane that fragile??? Now, take 420 kts, and 50% margin...
767Captain 1 year ago
@767Captain I guess you are not really a 767 pilot but a troll. The last Vspeed which must be demonstrated is not Vd but VFC - flight characteristics, which is still under 400 knots at around 390 knots.
People like you make big claims without any substantiation or logic behind them.
Why would Boeing incur the huge expense of strengthening their aircraft to a cope with very high speeds the aircraft is never designed to do?
skyarcher 1 year ago
@767Captain So here your task troll.
Post here documented evidence of any large jet liner exceeding 400 knots at ground level. You talk so confidently about this that I am sure it will be easy to find?
400 knots is still miles away from the official story.
skyarcher 1 year ago