Shot at 120fps, 300fps, and 600fps. All the camcorder's slow motion modes are very low resolution. Read our full lab-tested review: http://bit.ly/b1UGAU
I like all these tests; However, there is huge inconsistencies from test to test. Skewing the results for each camera performance. 1. The lighting is soo not consistent in brightness or light placement. 2. Jar containing the marbles are moved reflecting light off corners, impairing visibility of the marbles. 3. The distance of the test cameras to the test subject differ. 4. The LCD display is leaning at varying angles rendering LCD readability vastly different though no fault of the camera.
I like all these tests; However, there is huge inconsistencies from test to test. Skewing the results for each camera performance. 1. The lighting is soo not consistent in brightness or light placement. 2. Jar containing the marbles are moved reflecting light off corners, impairing visibility of the marbles. 3. The distance of the test cameras to the test subject differ. 4. The LCD display is leaning at varying angles rendering LCD readability vastly different though no fault of the camera.
emailmemrstara 1 year ago
The pinwheels really tell the story. The progressive vs. interlaced sensor debate gets settled in a test like this...
Whitehorze 2 years ago
Waste of time lol
FirstBrickStudios 2 years ago
Nice camera....
SurnameDiamond 2 years ago
Nice cam
TheRaF02 2 years ago