Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Bakunin refutes capitalist "individualist freedom"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
30,622
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 22, 2008

Anarchism

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 79 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Individualist Anarchism is not the same as Anarcho-Capitalism.

  • @SuperOldschool1969 "another word for socialism; revenge." - aqueenowlbee

see all

All Comments (393)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @SSTTEEAALLTTHH Because two people cannot build a house in the same place, nor occupy the same space.

    Wrong again, government makes a claim on the body of its citizens all the time by telling them what they can do (prostitution), what they can eat (drugs) and what they can say (speech). It also controls labor through taxes.

    And still wrong, most people DO NOT own land and yet they survive just fine. Where do you get these silly ideas?

  • @SSTTEEAALLTTHH Nonsense, there is more land than there are people.

  • @LordShandor

    Land is the most basic of things you need to survive. It gives you living space, provides you with food and water. Owning land is owning someone else's body.

  • @LordShandor

    Those are not philosophical bases of legitimacy, they are pragmatical reasons. There are pragmatical reasons for a lot of things that have no legitimacy (such as the government). I ask you to show me the legitimacy of owning land.

    Comparing land to your body is ridiculous since no else can make a claim to live of your body (unless you are a cannibal). In fact, by owning land, you do own the life of other people, since they can only survive with land.

  • @SSTTEEAALLTTHH If you aren't committing treason in this time frame, you aren't for liberty.

  • @SSTTEEAALLTTHH For the same reason that other people do not have the right to use your body as they wish, because 1) resources are scarce and therefore will be contested as to their desired use, 2) without property rights, there is no way of deciding who gets to eat the banana or wear that pair of socks.100 people cannot.

    Your reasoning results in absurdity, i.e. "what right do you have deny others access to having sex with you whenever they wish?"

  • @aqueenowlbee you mean jealousy

  • @LordShandor

    Theft as in deprivation. I ask you:

    What give you the right to own land, aka, to deny others access to land and resources?

  • @303Miles

    Proudhon joined the state. That would be treason to an anarchist who is proclaiming 'fuck the state'. Fuck Proudhon. Bakunin kicks his ass.

    My favorite philosophical anarchist though, way before the term even existed, was Rousseau. He argued for some state in certain cases, but recognized the illegitimacy of the State, property rights etc. Also the most quotable character ever.

  • @SSTTEEAALLTTHH That's incredibly stupid. Based on what you just said there is no such thing as property and therefore no such thing as theft. You are incoherent as hell.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more