Are we the dice players of Quantum Physics?

Could we be the dice players of quantum physics, could we form our own probability relative to our position and momentum? And could the uncertainty of quantum mechanics be the same uncertainty we have in our everyday life.

This theory is based on two simple postulates,

1) The first is that the quantum wave particle function explained by Schrödinger's wave equation represents the forward passage of time or arrow of time itself photon by photon or moment by moment.

2) The second is that Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty that we have with any future event.

Modern physics has no understanding of why we have an arrow of time or a future and a past. But time in this theory is a continuous process forming the future geometry of spacetime; time is the hidden variable of quantum mechanics.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Theoretical
• Physics
• Quantum
• Mechanics
• Albert
• Einstein
• General
• relativity
• Erwin
• Schrodinger
• Wave
• Equation
• Werner
• Heisenberg
• Uncertainty
• Principle
• Matrix
• Mathematics
• Max
• Planck
• Constant
• of
• Action
• Isaac
• Newton
• Laws
• inverse
• square
• law
• Electron
• Photon
• Light
• Quanta

[KurdstanPlanetarium]

Another MInd bogling yet great Quantum Pyhsics video...

I just want to know, we always represnt Arrow of time as a liner, but what is a possiblity that it could be curved like every thing else in the Univers? even light curves around stars and in a curved Universe.

There are those who belives in Mulit-Unverse then how Time is passed from one to the other. or even those belive that Universe expand and contract continuously is there any posiblity of negative time (reversed time)?

[nickharvey7]

@KurdstanPlanetarium We have an Arrow of time, but we also have Proper Time. The rate that time flows relative to the energy of mass of an object. Time will run slower around an object of great mass forming time dilation and the geometry of Einstein’s curvature of spacetime. In this theory we cannot go backwards in time because we are always forming our own spacetime relative to our energy of mass.

[luc59457]

@nickharvey7 Exactly.. It is not relative to the universe at large.

[nickharvey7]

@luc59457 In this theory because classical mechanics is an approximation of quantum mechanics that the uncertainty of quantum physics forms a base for the uncertainty of our everyday life. Therefore it would be relative to our Universe at large.

[luc59457]

@nickharvey7 Indeed we are relative to the universe at large, but we are a part that has become aware, conscious.

[nickharvey7]

@WiseMonkey888 Yes time is linear but we also have Proper Time. The rate that time flows relative to the energy or mass of an object. Time will run slower around an object of great mass forming time dilation and the geometry of Einstein’s curvature of spacetime.

[TheResidentSkeptic]

@KurdstanPlanetarium Black holes can have any mass. Think of a stellar black hole more like a neutron star that you can't see.

[KurdstanPlanetarium]

@TheResidentSkeptic I wouldnt say that...you see Black holes gravitaonal force so enormous that even light itself with its tremdeous speed does not escape it...a typical diameter of a black hole is about 3 Km, imagine our sun with its diameter nearly 1 million Km contracts to mere 3 Km, thats not normal is it...althought black holes usually made by stars 10 times or more massive than our sun..

to me the Physics inside and around a black hole is different than our phyiscs.

[TheResidentSkeptic]

@KurdstanPlanetarium That's incorrect. Black holes do not "Devour everything around it". If the sun collapsed into a black hole tomorrow, the orbits of the planets would be uneffected. Black holes can only interact gravitationally, so if it has the same mass as the sun, it would produce the exact same effect. Objects "fall" into black holes, just like you "fall" to earth from space. The ones created in the LHC evaporate by quickly by Hawking radiation because of their low mass.

[luc59457]

@luc59457 of*

[luc59457]

@KurdstanPlanetarium It definitely won't behave the same... A Large star will behave differently than a small one like our sun, through time, so it should be said that the same would apply to a black hole or different sizes and magnitudes of energy.

[KurdstanPlanetarium]

@rebokism well I just wonder !!!

[KurdstanPlanetarium]

@luc59457 well they said they can create a Black Hole that lasts for fractions of a second...but Black holes by nature devours everything around it and grow fatter even by fractions of seconds so, it may not behave as they predict it, to last for short period of time...to be honest those who talke such non sences dont even know what thet dealing with...I dont trust false judgement that may cost us dear..