I Understand the Convoluted Evolution Process

I CORRECTLY explain what evolution is, a convoluted mess.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• atheist
• darwin
• debate
• dawkins
• richard
• design
• creationism
• intelligent
• truth
• logic
• proof
• response
• theory
• reason
• kent
• belief
• evidence
• theism
• talk
• discussion
• earth

[gjs5897]

Nice cupboard. Was that your long suffering mother starting up the vacuum cleaner at the end? To clean the carpets or drown out your crazed rantings?

[prophetbyronmotley]

@gjs5897 Speaking of "crazed rantings," I have to comment of one of Richard Dawkin's pages on youtube.

[ulodetero]

"I understand evolution"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA­HAH-*gasps for breath*- AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH­AHAhahahahahahahahahaa!!

Not sure if you're aware, but just stating something doesn't make it a fact. There's a *reason* people tell you you don't understand. I'd suggest maybe learning about the subject and asking questions, instead of just asserting oft-refuted and long-discarded arguments as truth!

[prophetbyronmotley]

@ulodetero It's the OLD ME who would've MOCKED you pure lack of understanding.....but since I'm NOT like that, I can only PITY the INCREDIBLE IGNORANCE Satan the Devil has filled your world with!

[TheWayTruthLight1]

Oh Prophet Byron! Keep up the Lord's glory. Though I heard you may have taken Jehovah God's name in vain, I hope you won't burn for eternity for it. God does not like cursing and those who curse him shall perish.

[prophetbyronmotley]

@TheWayTruthLight1 I Take Jehovah God's name in vain? NEVER!

[AussieNaturalist]

1) Evolution doesnt state that there will be any "hybrids"

2) A Scientific Theory is an explanation of known facts, laws and empirical data. A simple fact isnt as well supported as a Scientific Theory

3) Looking up the word "theory" and using that definition is either ignorant or dishonest as what you are talking about is a "Scientific Theory" which is TOTALLY different!

Take note of these 3 simple points as they can correct ALL your misunderstandings, an honest person would acknowledge this

[BillKiernan]

i guess God put leg bones, arm joints, finger bones, etc on whales and dolphins, and put MAMMALS in the water who have to come up for air for the lulz? please don't have kids.

[AegisMU]

@BillKiernan Lol pwnt.

[1Erik85]

@prophetbyronmotley "superficial appearance of likeness of species"

DNA is not superficial. When you compare the genomes of different species all of the predictions made by Evolutionary Theory are shown to be true.

[gjs5897]

@prophetbyronmotley Ha, which truthful statement are you referring to? Anyhoo, didn't mean to be so coarse in my first comment but, like you, we all have our beliefs.

[SomeCheesyBalls]

Can you do a video on the tower of babel please?

[ulodetero]

@prophetbyronmotley (cont'd)

So it turns out I've done a lot of the work for you, by explaining your mistakes and showing you exactly *where* to look and *what* to look for. Now, please, admit your ignorance and gain some actual knowledge on the subject! And, by all means, if you have any real evidence to support any kind of god, please provide it. Just stating your beliefs or a personal experience is *not* evidence, by the way.

[ulodetero]

@prophetbyronmotley (cont'd)

genetics (DNA sequencing & analysis), paleontology, embryology, taxonomy, biogeography, as well as cool stuff such as atavisms, vestigiality, human chromosome #2, and endogenous retroviruses. (Look up "Evidence_of_common_descent" on Wikipedia. Also: YouTube/Ohd5uqzlwsU?t=35m35s)

You also seem to have confused 'hybrids' with 'transitional fossils', of which, by the way, there are shedloads (Wiki: List_of_transitional_fossils). Seriously, Wikipedia is your friend!

[ulodetero]

@prophetbyronmotley (cont'd)

the inferences of which lead to hypotheses, which are rigorously *tested* again and again, the results submitted to peer review where they are tested *some more, again*, after which, finally, when there are no inconsistencies or contradictions, and all possibilities of mistakes have been eradicated, it finally achieves the level of Theory. And the evidence for evolution is more than just similarity of appearance. There's morphology (including internal structure),..