Cops are the new Ron Paul

Sponsor: http://NHLiberty.org - Cops are the new Ron Paul.

Some or all of the vid in this clip is likely available for you to use commercially. Basically anything that was shot by me or was public domain to begin with. My stuff is automatically released into the public domain. Until I say otherwise. Usually if I shot it, "RidleyReport.com" or "YouTube.com/WinWinParty" will appear at the bottom. Anything which has that super or was obviously shot by me is public domain.

Illustrated with video...from RidleyReport.com & friends.

Like what you see here?? Donate...to the Ridley Report most easily using Bitcoin. See my latest BTC address at
http://nhunderground.com/forum/index....
I tend to keep the wallet fairly empty, for security reasons.
So...don't be shy about letting me know you've donated. That way I can evacuate or spend the BTC's....

How to buy an ad for yourself on this channel:
http://nhunderground.com/forum/index....

good cops new hampshire police abuse libertarians beatings ridleyreport caught on tape liberty right to record ron paul border patrol checkpoints manchester law enforcement officers dave ridley report. wiretapping laws cops turn off the cameras shut it off Creative commons license bailiffs courts police state public domain footage viral videos free state project free to use. live free or die, dashcam dash camera dashboard arrested corrupt corruption. staters nh raw news video dui suspicionless checkpoints roadblocks

• Category

  News & Politics

[mwhitten77]

The problem with all this is now, Mr. Ridley, is that nobody knows what any of you are debating anymore. You're right, it looks like you all are just seeking publicity from wherever you can get it rather than focusing on one or two meritorious campaigns. All it looks like you guys do is harass cops now...and you do it so you get publicity, meaning "hits" which we all know is how you make money. So, in reality, you are the root of this "tree of evil" that you invented so you can have a job.

[RidleyReport]

We are debating, with pro-aggression people, whether they should be using acts of aggression.

[mwhitten77]

Now Ridley, I know that you are different, and I might go as far as to say that you don't belong where you are and could do much more good in a more meritorious setting, do you honestly believe that this movement as a whole responds with non-aggression? Because all I see is aggression; from CopBlock, Ian Freeman, and even Derrik's passive-aggression...the chalking, the singing inside someone's store, drinking beer in court...etc., etc., etc., etc.,

[RidleyReport]

You should tell us about a free stater committing an act of aggression, when and where has this happened? I can join you in condemning it if it ever has.  Presumably it must have happened at least once! Tell us where to find the video of it; point out the actual act of aggression.

[mwhitten77]

I believe I named several...the most notable was Adam "Freeman" Mueller lying in wait to berate a judge about finding him in contempt. I think that would be pretty scary if people were allowed to pop up and scare judges like that.

But, I understand that your view requires that the judge actually get beat up or killed before any "act" has occurred, so I guess I don't have an example for you right now...

[RidleyReport]

So.. you are saying that "lying in wait to berate" is an act of aggression? I thought that was speech.

[eddiecarlcalhoun]

Ron Paul was slaughtered by the news media making sure he had no chance to win the nomination....And I'm still pissed.........LIVE FREE OR DIE....

[RidleyReport]

I already did a vid with that title.

[baggytheo]

How is filming a person who is ostensibly a public servant harassing them?

[firstflyover]

The Fed is the root. Love it...

[unreality6794]

copblock dot org

[anyshitt]

Hear hear!

[mwhitten77]

How about undue influence? I believe what distinguishes an individual that is merely waiting to speak with someone from the beloved Ademo, is that he is berating a judge about a recent case, and I believe he was involved to some extent with that case? I'm not sure though...my memory is all fuzzy, so you can let me know if I am mistaken.

Now, you answer my question: in your opinion, does someone have to actually be hurt, harmed, injured, in order for a wrong to have been committed?