Mustang Vs 9c1 Caprice on freeway

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
46,632
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 7, 2007

a 95 9c1 caprice leaves a mustang GT in its dust. The mustang tries to keep up...BUT... It's a mustang!

Coming back from testing the latest gun builds in the desert. Had all our cases and ammo plus the two of us With the air full blast. Easily another 800Lbs of weight onboard. A Mustang GT V8 with loud exhaust. Tried passing us on the on ramp. What happend next Was sad...But... all to tipical with ford products.

(P.S. Yes We hit 143mph before I let off. Radar was screaming. The mustang had, had enough after about 100mph)

  • likes, 16 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (chainmaker1)

  • im lookin for a 9c1 my favorite car

  • @mitcholobe Sorry. Just sold my last one.Thanks for watching though.

  • 122? Shit she was just hitting cruisin speed :P

    Ω

  • @om3gadagg3r We actualy got to 143MPH but the radar was screaming I had slowed to 122 when my buddie looked at the speedo. THANKS FOR WATCHING

Top Comments

  • LOL- the fact that you casually answer the phone at 122mph makes this even more badass...

  • maybe he wasnt sure if you were a cop or not

Video Responses

This video is a response to Rumble in the Desert II Caprice vs. SRT 10
see all

All Comments (133)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Caprice's are very underated cars!

    

  • no the mustang had better things to do like throwing up after seeing your ugly face.

  • @LTwon Obviously you have not heard about the new Caprice 9C1 coming out in 2011, 6.0L 355HP, 6 speed transmission, and rear wheel drive.

  • Man ford licks fagg cock my 5.7 chevrolet caprice will fuck a mustang up ford has crappy cars they ant built tough suck for racing take it from a old ford owner

  • @LTwon but they dont come close they beat it by 40hp and its smaller displacement

  • @LTwon Yea, but you're talking about a 24% bigger engine, two valves and essentially the same structure, but only 4% more horsepower and 11% more torque....that's it. And I don't deal with theoreticals when it comes to engines....essentially, Ford hasn't changed the engine in 20 years because they really haven't had to. Go look at the 5.4 SOHC from 1996 or 1997 and you'll see that the difference is maybe 10% or less.

    And I hope a 6.2L pushrod makes more HP than a 20 year old 4.6L V8. ;)

  • @redoctober90 Only thing Ford did better was keeping the full size rwd platform, GM's sucks for dropping theirs, imagine how much more wicked a 2010 Caprice 9C1 would be if the chassis had 15 years more refinement and the power of the LS series?!?!?! Yeee ha.

    Oh Ford also got the retro styling of the Mustang right, the new Camaro is ugly.

  • @redoctober90 Big deal, your talking a modified CV with a more powerful NEW engine transplant vs stock FIFTEEN-SEVENTEEN year old stock 9C1? LOL joke. Two can play that game, Drop a new LS motor in a Caprice, once again...CV LOOSES..by a HUGE margin Sorry modern Ford motors suck, GM makes over 500 hp with push rods, one cam and 2 valves, Ford needs DOHC, 4 valves per and a blower to come close.

    BTW I'm a long time Ford lover, my baby is a '67 Galaxie, as was 1st car many decades ago.

  • @86fordf250 "If the Vics had the 5.4....." LOL what a joke and cheap excuse from the CV lovers. Wowie, the newest engine from Ford vs. an out of production motor from Chevy. Twy comparing that 5.4 boat anchore to the newest LS motors...WHOOPS.....The Vic will look like a donkey cart...in reverse! 

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more