Imagining the Tenth Dimension part 1 of 2

@ChuAnFanBoy This video is pseudoscience, and your comments are pointless. Just because you don't believe something doesn't make your viewpoint true. Which is why your spouting tripe in the comments section of a pseudoscience vid. Real cientists go out and make observations and collect data. Personal opinion never enters into science. Discussing your opinion shows you don't understand the basics of science. And if you don't understand the basics, you are not qualified to discuss Theory.

This guy is a musician, and this is pseudo-science.

Wrap this one around your heads : when driving a car around a corner at high speeds, you feel right or left g-forces. If you turned yourself 90 deg right or left in the seat when taking that corner, it would feel like you're hitting the throttle or slamming on the brakes. Now if you are stopped and punched the accelerator driving in a straight line, you would still feel the g-forces. Think about this, you're not steering around any corners, because it's in the fourth direction, a curve in time.

This would fit well with Einstein's posit that speed through space + speed through time must = speed of light.

IMO, this shows us that the speed of light is either equal to the distance around the universe, or instantaneous, or even 0 in its "unobserved state"(makes sense if we were to assume that without-space-time, everything exists as a single-point, to someone in a higher dimension), because how does time or something appear to standstill, or in other words, doesn't change state? The only answer is that it goes around the universe, back to its original spot.

Another way to look at Einstein's relativity is this. Let's assume that the Earth is the universe, and that the distance around the Earth is equal to the speed of light in one sec, we can see that anyone traveling close to the speed of light, would be able to get to the 299999999 km point(the point just right before the starting point) almost instantaneously, while anyone moving at 1 km/s would take a very long time.

None of this contradicts Einstein's simultaneity experiment or Vertical Theory, however. By defining time as different states, we could still say that the person inside the train experiences the two states differently, from the observer outside of the train.

Einstein's relativity can actually be understood in very simple terms. For example, let's say that we define where you are right now by 3-dimensional space and one dimension of "time," and call it "present location." Now let's say you stepped 10 m to your right, and define this event or state as "future location." You can see how if you were to move from "present location" at 1 m/s, you would experience(or take) more time than by moving at 5 m/s, to reach "future location."

Aging slower simply means that, aging slower. If we were to define time as I defined above, that is, the 4th dimension of space, or different state of the universe, then what happens, IMO, when someone or something moves fast is simply that the space around him curves so fast, such as while it seems like an eternity for someone moving slower to reach that destination state, it seems like one sec or less to the person moving very fast.

According to Einstein(again), the faster we move, the more time slows down. Well, I'm going to make a bold claim here, and say that this is where I believe Einstein and physicists erred. To me, "aging slower" or the radioactive clock decaying slower do NOT mean the same as time slowing down.

To me, universal(or what perceive intuitively) time is eternal.