Imagining the Tenth Dimension part 1 of 2

@belivingtheword

I was just wondering where you don't believe this is a possible explanation to reality?

I do understand, and generally it would be fair to always consider that just because we can represent relationships in terms of dimensions, does not mean that these dimensions actually exist separate from anything else, or that they may be separated from anything else.

Your id 'belivingtheword' makes perfect sense.

Yes, each d is simply a representative value correlating to the preemptive "final" d, & not a separate existence. Thus, we exist in the final d. I'm not trying to make a proselyte out of you. I'm just saying that this video does not fit in my realm of rational thought. As you can guess from my id, I am familiar with crossing the border between logic and faith. I just choose not to have faith in folding dimensions.

Ok, then following our example I would look to define a point as having a dimension of itself, which means a point = the representation of a value of a position. It takes this attribute with it for every value that it defines rather than sitting in a particular or exclusive dimension.

Also, I can see your example working really well if we represent 1d through 3d as truly inseparable, and any distinction of such d is only a distinction of 3d.

I hurt my brain.
I uderstood untill the 6th dimention popped up.
I did pretty well for my age I guess :3

That's if you assume there is a next plane. That was the concept I was explaining when I made the analogy of stretching a point into a line. A line is not comprised of points. You can arbitrarily assign a point value, but a point has no dimension, thus cannot interact with a line. In the same manner, a line cannot interact with a plane. The mere existence of a "higher" dimension precludes the simultaneous independent existence of lower dimensions because energy cannot be created or destroyed.

I think that most answers to such a question provide valuable insight.

'Existence is intelligence' is an amazing recognition. I totally understand.

If I'm not mistaken, mentioning a next plane of opposite energy is a possibility that's been worked on. We can easily start to see the significance when we think of + and - charges.

I may not fully understand the question, but I'll try. Existence is comprised of energy in any pattern. Thus, existence is intelligence, considering intelligence is a pattern.

One could "move" a plane if all the energy in the next plane was equally opposite. It would not be even liminal, as opposed to some huge leap as described in the video.

I'm a finance guy, so I don't think about this stuff much. A coworker showed me the video a couple days ago, but it looks flawed to me in it's concept.

Currently for a fundamental approach:

I accept the nature of 'possibility' as the basis for existence.

Getting a feel for your approach, I would sincerely value your input on the following question:

How intelligent do you think existence is?