Tafseer Song of Solomon 5:16 Mohammed in the Bible - Deedat's errors

Mr. Deedat is a very dramatic speaker. But what he says is of little spiritual value because he makes gross errors in his handling of the Word of God. Primarily, Deedat makes claims that the Bible and Torah say things they simply DO NOT SAY.

But with his skilled flare for the dramatic, Deedat injects Mohammed into the Bible in various places with error after error.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Mohammed
• Bible
• Deedat
• Error
• Dawah
• Deception
• Islam
• Ahmed
• Muslim
• debate
• comparative
• religion
• christian
• Torah
• Psalms
• Jihad
• Tafsir
• Tafseer
• Tawheed
• Taweed
• Taqiyya
• Taqiya
• Allah
• Islamic
• Koran
• Quran
• Muhammad
• Song
• Solomon
• 5:16
• allah
• islamic
• muhammad
• quran
• koran
• christianity
• nasheed
• sheikh
• ramadan
• imam

[Texas75023]

Katrooosh - I went to hit APPROVE, but hit REMOVE accidentally.

@Texas75023

in the video

/watch?v=0YJ0E4P6PMU

what is your theory for the rabbi who pronounced Mohammad exactly as Arab do or Deedat did! 5:13

and what is your reaction in the video when the word translated as mohammad, muhamad exactly!!! 7:19

I responded more fully in a private message.

[Katrooosh]

you actually did nothing, in the video Deedat said Mohamadim you said Machmad, and what machmad sound like???? Machmad,,,,,,,,,,mahmad,,,,,,,­­, mohammad,,,,mehmet OR Achmad excatly how the Quran said it was!!!! Achmad is Ahmad.

Yet you say NO, Islam is a religion from a man from the dessert? did u know that Mohammad wasn't named before in the Arab land!

man you should really reconsider

again there should be rating or even a direct comment to provide the truth!

[Texas75023]

@Katrooosh If the word 'Mohammed' was not a NAME before it was given to Mohammed - then the claim the NAME of Mohammed appeared 600 years EARLIER in a text in a FOREIGN LANGUAGE where it was using an ADJECTIVE and NOT a name - it is ludicrous to claim such a word IS A NAME, of a man in the future.

The surrounding text DOES NOT SAY - 'And the name of a FUTURE PROPHET will be - Mohammed'. Sorry, my friend, but Islam's claim is childish nonsense. A DESPERATE attempt but nothing more.

[irishxxkelt]

Muslims want it both ways.....the Bible is corrupt/the Bible foretold Mohammed.

[irishxxkelt]

5 stars Texas

[Texas75023]

@gamemanksa2009 You are VERY confused, my friend. you state 'like i do as u c i was always giving u proofs frm none muslums ' and IN THE MESSAGE ABOVE, you write 'from the quran An-Nisa,4:82 (Do they not consider the Qur'an? Had it been from any other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much discrepancy)'

I can see WHY you are completely confused, my friend. You do not seem to know what YOU have written. Seriously, brother, do not waste my time with obvious lies.

[Texas75023]

@gamemanksa2009 Please do not confuse a 'CLAIM' from islam, with the concept of a 'Proof' or 'Proving'. When Mohammed made baseless and unsupported statements, those are not 'PROOFS', they are 'baseless' claims. It means they have no EVIDENCE and no FOUNDATION.

The Quran contradicts itself, brother. ONLY the 2 parties in a Covenant, God and Christians, have a RIGHT or even KNOWLEDGE to discuss the TERMS and MEANING of the Covenant BETWEEN THEM. Mohammed is simply an confused bystander.

[Texas75023]

@gamemanksa2009 You just ADMITTED a mouthful, my friend. There NEVER WAS a book written by Allah. Mohammed MADE UP his revelations as ANSWERS to whatever the SITUATIONAL NEED was. Depending on the 'need in his life' he conveniently CAME UP with a NEW revelation. And when his previous statements were insufficient, Mohammed CHANGED the message. This includes a 'Mualim' having ONLY 4 WIVES. When that was no longer convenient for HIM, Mhmd got a 'REVELEATION' that HE ALONE could have more.

[gamemanksa2009]

@Texas75023 not really can u please give me sources like i do as u c i was always giving u proofs frm none muslums nt a muslum coz f i bring my sources frm islam u'll not accept it &that is y u c my sources is acceptable coz i prove it with not my standers but none muslms agrees with it & they r all have knowledge more than both of us the thing that u said(the ruls have 2 ably on both )will i have aply it on myself but as i c u really ddn't apply it coz u only explain with no sources 2 pack u up

[gamemanksa2009]

@Texas75023 oh dear you think this vers4.157is a discrepancy? let me guess with5 14 srsly thu u really didn't understand this

in islam we believe that juses was a propt & not god & this was proven many times it will as a discrepancy if you apply it with your illogical way i saw ur vid you really i advise u 2 see the debate between Islam & Christianity i told u before u can't use a sources from ur side to proof ur point like now it's discrepancy coz you defin it with ur rule not islam

[gamemanksa2009]

@Texas75023 ou really don't know the quran don't you you see the proof that support my point is this : JIBREEL didn't give a whole book coz if you see the event in the propthis life he was having the vers of the quran depending on the event that the muslum nation was facing so if you think that the propht made that up you simply didn't read the quran coz quran if you truly want to understand it you have to know arabic + see what Lesley Hazleton said about the quran

/watch?v=O7yaDlZfqrc

[Texas75023]

@gamemanksa2009 Actually, Christians and jews HAVE considered the 'self-supporting (but baseless) claims by the author of the Quran. the MANY ERRORS in it HAVE convinced us it cannot be from God. The Quran JUDGES ITSELF, brother. And the judgment is condemnation of a false message from a false messenger.

When the Quran contradicts itself, as it does, it simply has NO chance to be taken seriously as a message from a deity. You can WATCH my video that prove it's faults, my friend.