MoonFaker: A Puffy Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon. P1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
8,092
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 25, 2008

http://www.moonmovie.com
http://www.billkaysing.com
http://www.ralphrene.com
http://www.moonhoax.us

Whoa! Such a long title this film has: amazing it fits!

A critical analysis of Apollo A7L/A7L-B spacesuits. Topics discussed in this video include suit inflation, suit damage, and suit flexibility.

Uncovers evidence of the National Space Society LYING to protect NASA's lies!!!


Jarrah White would like to invite you to see the Apollo 11 footage that Svector, Phantom Wolf and Shane Killian have tried to suppress from public view.

APOLLO XI: THE LITTLE GEM
http://moonhoax.us/littlegem.htm

See also the evidence of faked and suppressed Apollo 10 footage that Mark Gray doesn't want you to see.

FLAGGING THE GEMS
http://moonhoax.us/flagginggems.htm

  • likes, 25 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (WhiteJarrah)

  • Mythbusters pretty much blew this whole Moon Hoax nonsense clear out of the water. We went to to the moon. Deal with it.

  • @JGDeRuvo You haven't heard? The Mythbusters is just "entertainment, not science".

    Here's how Savage reacts when the flaws with the moon hoax special are brought to his attention: watch?v=9TH4BfIwBXs

  • You are comparing a suit in micro gravity (zero-g) and a suit in lunar gravity (1/6 earth) and that could account for a big change. If you notice the zero-g suit, it is ballooned, but there are still wrinkles. Gravity could form the wrinkles differently. I have seen "moon rocks" in person, and while I did not see the same rocks on the moon, the rocks and dust were unlike anything I had ever seen before. They had abrasive jagged edges, not smooth edges like normal rocks/dust.

  • "I have seen "moon rocks" in person"

    So have I. Moon rocks are discussed in "MoonFaker: Exhibit D"

  • But nevermind, it's better you do your things here on YT, instead of going 'outside' on the streets and hurting people.

  • Goodbye.

Top Comments

  • "Well Jarrah, I didn't start the crap."

    Funny. Disagreeing with a person about Apollo is one thing, posting childish and immature cheap shots is another. If you wish to continue posting I suggest you refrain from posting these kinds of messages.

  • legoking, I do not even know where to begin about how disgraceful your comment is!

    Insults, and in very bad english.... Damn, is this the mentality of the average Propagandist?

    Use a spell checker first, and then do some real research into Project Apollo.... Once you look at all of the videos, and open your mind, then come back in here and make some intelligent comments..

    Damn.... Propagandists not doing research first, and then putting up insulting comments in here, is absolutely astounding!

see all

All Comments (134)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Occam's Razor - All things being equal, the most plausible explanation should be accepted unless there is LEGITIMATE evidence proving otherwise.

    What is more plausible? The United States created 5 hoax videos, with 5 different astronaut crews to trick the world into believing it went to the moon, and Russia with all of its resources could not disprove it, but some dickhead working on his MacBook could....OR we went to the moon.

  • Correction: After analyzing the hammer drop frame by frame. Here is a new light: The hammer did dropped for 1.16 seconds. It seems it fits the moon gravity perfectly and my theory was debunked by myself. However, during that 1 second and 5 frames, I can see that the hammer dropped in one frame, and stopped in the next frame, then it dropped and stop again.

    What does that prove? The video was purposely slowed down to fit the timing. There is NO WAY the hammer can stop in the mid-air by itself.

  • Do a little math combine with an experiment, and you will know the truth. If a hammer is dropped from 1.2 meter high, on the earth it will take 0.49 seconds to hit the ground. On the moon, due to the 1/6 gravity, the same hammer will keep falling for 1.2 seconds.

  • Now go do a simply experiment yourself. First get some object that has little air resistance. Play the video, when the astronaut drop the hammer, drop your object at the same time. You will find out that the hammer hit the ground almost the same time as your object. It didn't take 2.4x of timing to hit the ground.

    So it's obvious that both the hammer and the feather were dropped under the earth gravity.

  • "The United States and Russia were faced with a problem"...they show two scientists. One 'Russian' one 'American'.....BOTH EX-NAZIS from Project Paperclip here and whatever name they gave it in the USSR!!!......LMFAO

  • jarrah they dont like the fact that your work is interesting ..keep the videos coming

  • @NASAvsPETE what a complete dickhead PETE

  • Ed White suit was different .... simple... Ed White had problems with his spacesuit during first EVA...Some years passed beetween Apollo and Gemini missions. They just improved spacesuits.

  • Jarrah's voice got that way from choking on too many cocks.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more