Defense in a Stateless Society

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,703
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 7, 2008

Defense in a Stateless Society

  • likes, 15 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Organized religion is Authority. That's why many Anarchists are anti-theist.

  • "Spontaneous Order". Its a fact anti-anarchist propaganda has tried so hard to suppress, and has for the most part.

see all

All Comments (134)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @MrSteventodd Well in a democracy, they should theoretically be protected because the "constitution" says so (LOL), or if the majority votes to allow them to be protected. Segregation was state-enforced and costly.

  • but then who protects minorities & political victims?

  • The soudis work with the u.s to capture terrorists, if you talk about money imagine what soudi Arabia has to lose we are its biggest consumer of oil.

  • i dont really understand your arguement. all of things you said about the TSA, about war as a racket, they just ponted out that the state does a poor job defending the people. however if the state is not there, wouldnt it just be even worse? it makes me think of this metaphor: the state is a filter, it stops things we dont want from getting to us(other governments, terrorists, disease, etc.). yes the filter has hole, but how does that justify removing the filter?? please explain.

  • Hitler could have walked into The UK Any time he wanted, He choose not to, You also have to remember they were quite advanced at the time, Jet fighter planes, V2 rockets and near atomic weapons, If he did invade the UK, The USA Could not have prepared for D Day From their shores, As we know from history, We got lucky, He went East

  • @IronColumnAnarchism well spoken comrade! though I am deist, and Socialist. But still.

  • There is now way how a stateless society can win a war against an equal sized state.

    If the U.S. would "disolve" a medium sized European country could take other the country. The points you make against it are invalid.

  • Invading Saudi Arabia would be just another genocide!

  • The title here is misleading. At no point in this video did you explain how a "stateless" society is going to protect itself. Second, your example of employees taking over after the "Managers" left and still ran the company is also misleading. The company wasn't run without managers. Individual employees BECAME the managers. It would be no different than if you fired a manager and hired another. This video is a big fail.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more