Cessna 172 IFR Visual Approach during Rain Storm

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
47,530
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 20, 2007

IFR visual approach into Houston Hobby International Airport

Category:

Travel & Events

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (worldofaviation)

  • For the Record, I was on an IFR Flight Plan and ATC said, "Cleared for the Visual Rwy 30 Right". It was VFR between me and the touchdown point on the runway, but if I had to go missed approach, I would have gone 0/0 on the visibility, but since I was still on an IFR flight Plan, I would have been legal to execute the missed. Remember guys, NEVER cancel your IFR, just ask to be cleared for the visual, that way your covered and most of all SAFE! If it went IFR, I would side-step to 30L to the ILS.

Top Comments

  • Those guys at the tower must've been really keen on the weather conditions, because those rain showers could''ve easily developed into thunderstorms, with possible downdrafts. That pilot was as cool as a cucumber, though.

see all

All Comments (85)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • See this looks bad, but I had a Cirrus SR20 G3 GTS up in slight rain and the way it beaded up the windscreen turned a challenging approach into a multi-crew scenario. The Cirrus is an issue when being used for teaching as the Instructor can't get a good view of PFD or backup instruments so it really was a case of Instructor flying, me handling flaps and calling out our airspeed on the way down. Good landing btw! 8o)

  • Nice landing...

  • You should use RainX.

  • Nice video.

  • Looks like an old 172. Is it carburated or injected? Id stay the hell out of that weather w a carburated engine.

  • @210482fmj the engines are chosen in regard of speed an purpose. A cessna has a max speed of like 160 knots. More than that and there is risk of material fatigue (followed by death). Ull need a new airplane, more expensive, more heavy, more consuming... ur just joking right?

  • I don't see why all light aircraft are not using jet engine technology now when it is lighter, smaller and uses less manafacturing materials. a jet powered 172 would be sweet.

  • You make it seem so easy.

  • Some nasty stuff there off to the right...

  • great landing

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more