Siskel and Ebert review Blue Velvet
Top Comments
All Comments (656)
-
@nikosvault You have the wrong person, kind heart. You need to take it up with DrPepperAndSteak. You are disagreeing with he or she, not me. He or She said it. If that is what you mean by, not is not. I think you mean, no it's not.
-
bullshit rog even if you weren't an atheist you'd still be going to hell for hating blue velvet
-
Did you know that he gave one star to "Blue Velvet" while giving three stars to "The Honeymooners"?
-
Rogers sure got this one all wrong. Great movie. People in the real world in end in situations like the ones faced by Rossellini's character. I don't get how he can take offense to this, while six years later he lauded "Bad Lieutenant", which goes even further than "Blue Velvet" in terms of shock value.
-
Are these guys a gay couple?
-
@oncelosthorizon But yeah, Siskel was very awesome.
-
@oncelosthorizon Aww, but I like Ebert. Haha.
-
@SirBraxton1989 I lol'd.
-
@mvies77 Beautifully said.
Is that Chaz Bono?
dellgriff82 3 months ago 4
His problem was that he could not get passed the shock to his own moral sensitivity. It doesn't make him evil or worth being called names. It makes him lacking in his professional ability to subjectively make an opinion. To make an opinion solely on his personal emotional reaction is totally the antithesis of his profession.
mvies77 1 month ago 3