Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

the truth behind the moon landings Part 1 widescreen

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
13,786
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 24, 2009

the truth behind the moon landings Part 1

did we really go to the moon?
Some people think we did not.

The Cast

Arguing for various aspects of the conspiracy theory were Bill Kaysing, described as an engineer and analyst for Rocketdyne, Brian O'Leary, a "NASA astronaut in the 1960's", Paul Lazarus, a producer, Ralph Rene, "Author/Scientist", Bart Sibrel, "Investigative Journalist", Jan Lundberg, described as a technician for Hasselblad, Donald Percey of the "Royal Photographic Society" and Howard McCurdy, "space historian at American University." Counterarguments were supplied by former NASA spokesman Julian Scheer and Paul Field, NASA LEM specialist. Some of the claims made in the program are discussed below, followed by a few topics not addressed in the program.


Up to 20% of the American Public Believes We Did Not Go To The Moon.


Is this the same American public that regularly wrote angry letters to Dave Barry when he said stuff like the Leaning Tower of Pisa was in Paris, or that the Czech Republic and Slovakia used to go by the name "The Netherlands?" That wrote in saying they were afraid to stuff turkeys because he once wrote a column saying that giblet snakes lived inside? That American public?

There is no idea on God's green earth so dumb that you can't get a big chunk of the American public to buy it. These are the same people who believe you can cut taxes but expand services, and who believe you can extract oil from the ground indefinitely without running out of it.

And if 20% believe we didn't go to the moon, that means 80% do, right? Why are the 20% more worthy of being taken seriously than the 80%?


No Stars Are Visible
The Apollo astronauts all landed on the day side of the moon, and all the videos they shot from orbit were over the day side, so the exposure settings were all for daylight. Set your camera to 1/125 at f/8 (a setting typical of the slower films in use in 1969). Aim it at the night sky and shoot pictures. Tell me how many stars you see. Aim your camcorder at the sky and see how many stars you can film.

Even with the eye you'd have difficulty seeing stars from the daytime lunar surface unless you stood in a shadow and shielded yourself from any light reflected from the ground, for the same reason you can't see stars from a brightly lit parking lot at night.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Video Responses

This video is a response to Star Trek Enterprise Season 3
see all

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ok consider it true that america had landed but why America didn't try to land on moon again?

  • why they don't have try to film the sun or something like that ?

  • I want to believe we went to the moon . But if we didn't! im going be pissed off.! That shows the lack and incompentence of USA .that it will show wow we are realy behind how would you expect us to leave the Galaxy without Area 51 help!

  • @JohnF30Music forget that you know all the answers ha ha, u cock end

  • @TamaHawk20 On an old camera, the camera would choose a select contrast. Because the moon was so bright in the sun, the stars cannot be seen. try looking at stars while looking towards a streetlight, and notice it without the light. Its about the contrast, baby!

  • i believe we did go to the moon and apollo 18 9.2.11 watch it people

  • theres no stars WTF ???

  • @Emsworker68

    show a pic and state sources.

  • @robthesamplist Why is there a coke bottle on the moon surface? Explain that one to me.

  • @JohnF30Music And your mother gave birth to a dumbass which you by the way.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more