Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Das Gottkonzept: Güte

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
501 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 15, 2011

Letzter offizielle Teil
Ein paar Kommentare werden noch einen Zusatz bekommen

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (RazielKain)

  • What are civilization norms? Norms written by authorities whose enviorenment legalises colonialism, prostitution, a free drug order, pornography (soon legalized with 16 year old actors)? Were Churchill, Hitler, Stalin and Rooseweld civilized when they bombed cities of each other nations by killing hundrets of thousands civillians, by dropping nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Were England, Spain, Netherlands, Portugal, Italy and France civilized with their brutal colonialism?

  • @Sabljar So you honestly want to argue whether or not a society living in cities, with universal health care and support for the old and weak is more "civilized" compared to a bronze age tribe stoning disobedient children, having multiple wives and treating them like second class citizens which is described in the bible?

  • Developement is not a parameter to measure a civilization degree. Materialists are measuring civilization norms on materialistic values. "I´m more developed than you, so you´re a member of lower races and I´ve the right to colonize you!" After you develope your countries through brutal exploatations and slavery of colonized nations, you declare yourself as "higher and civilized races", leaving the colonized nations undeveloped, exhausted until today watching them starving. Civilized... rofl

  • @Sabljar A even higher civilized nation would help others in need, don't you think?

see all

All Comments (49)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Man könnte natürlich "das Leben" auch differenzieren, einmal Leben so wie DU und dein Philo. es verstehen, als eine Aneinanderkettung von Ion und Protein, also als bloße Autonome stofflich-elektrische Existenz.

    (Deine Bsp. sind also nur in Zusammenhang mit "deiner" Defini. von Leben zu gebrauchen.)

    oder man def. Leben außerhalb dieser Aneinanderkettung, nur fängt hier die A-Rationale Betrachtung des "Seins" an, was ja für die Empirische und Analytische Sichtweise auf Leben nicht möglich ist.

  • Exactly that is racism. I´ll agree with your statement, that every darwinist was/is a racist. You´re absolutely right. Finally you realized that Darwin and his followers are racists. There is no measure which can scale a civilization niveau. There are no "more" or "less" civilized races. That´s a darwinist illusion. There are only good and bad humans out there, like religion is reporting to us. Civilization norms can only globally been written in a concensus of all nations.

  • @Sabljar You do realize in what times Darwin lived, do you? In this time nearly everybody was racist and if you read what Darwin wrote in his books prior to the Origin of Species you would realize that he was tame compared to what used to be the norm and saying one culture which existed was higher or more civilized than another is hardly racist. So tell me: If artificial sexual selection does indeed not work why is it possible to get certain breeds in crops, animals etc. ?

  • @RazielKain

    Your problem is obviously not english. Your problem is to recognize the ideology hidden behind darwinism, what I´m explaining the whole time. Your 2nd problem is to understand, that artificual sexual selection doesn´t increase strengh, so not intelligence at all, like Darwin thought. That was the goal of Hitlers breeding farms. All this attempts failed. You get it now?

  • @RazielKain

    Sure it is an adjective to the therm "civilized", but he mentioned lower and higher races in this context - that what you don´t realize is that this is called "racism". Where´s your problem to understand this? Ranking of nations in "lower" and "higher" races in any context is called racism. That´s where religion makes a difference to darwinism, it doesn´t divide people on races with higher and lower features and development, it divides humans only in two groups: good and bad.

  • @Sabljar smear campaign then? I hate to say this but "Wake up and grow up" what you are doing is basically closing your eyes and saying "it can't see me if I can't see it" it doesn't care.

    On your question if I speak english ... well ... case and point

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more