Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Rahul Easwar - Live-in OR Marriage / Supreme Court Verdict - News National X

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
19,631
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 23, 2010

The News X Channel Discussion on Hon'ble Indian Supreme Court's Verdict on Live In Relationships, Marriages.

Shaina, Madhu Kishwar, Rahul Easwar participating. Jahangir of News X moderating.

Rahul Easwar "Next to God, I respect Indian Judiciary...But sadly there is an increasing tendency of Ethical Insensitivity, Cultural Insensitivity, ...Court & Govt Shd endorse Ethical Sensitivity, otherwise it will lead to destruction of Family System & Society

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • All I can see is that this video has been edited to point of view that live-in relationship is so bad and its taboo !!

    As far as I am concerned marriage is just like an live-in relationship except it has a legal value which live-in relationship doesn't have. And my first priority will be live-in relationship.

  • Most successful institution in human history???? Man, gimme a break! Alright, if u wanna fake it, fake it!

    and what do u mean by talkin about individual freedom and talkin abt asking around the world to live ur life??? Stand in one boat! Either this or that :P

  • Social sanction is a bad concept! Many people tend to fall in love with another man or woman after their marriage (mostly arranged), which are very subjective emotions. Fearing moral policing and societal norms, people are forced to hide such relations and continue with their married partners. It could be emotional trauma for the people concerned. Supreme Court’s verdict is more demanding personal sacrifices than protecting women!

  • 'Live in relationship' if the term is used in its real meaning, it does not allow a man to live with several women or exploit her. In western countries, there are more legal implications to the term than the way used by Indians. I am surprised, why people consider this as a western concept, because polygamy existed in India legally from ancient times while the modern religions of west advocate mainly long lasting single relationships (although, with changing times, they find it hard to follow).

  • that young man is an asset

  • Indeed, a great response from rahul easwar and from madhu too.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more