MIT Physics vs. 9/11 Conspiracy (Part 2)

Jeff King gives his thorough analysis of the WTC collapses on 9/11 and concludes that explosive controlled demolition is the only scientifically explainable hypothesis. This is research from early on, and doesn't account for many of the later discoveries, however, its still a very important video.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• engineer
• 911
• physics
• 9/11
• Science
• scientist
• engineering
• MIT
• physicist
• collapse
• building
• tower
• demolition
• explosion

[sumrandomkid1]

5:38 lol?have they ever been hit by huge jet airplanes carrying thousands of gallons of jet fuel?

[WarCrime911]

@sumrandomkid1, That's a very stupid argument, considering the official cause of collapse as cited by NIST was steel weakening from office fires causing truss failure and a cascading collapse ensued.

The real question should be why the building on the opposite side of where the plane crashed suddenly gave way on the opposite side of the building from the damage?

[UPYOURSBG]

@skidvicious71 .................the fact that you are on here everyday trying to debunk the 9/11 truth movement only proves that your a shill....because the sheep who really honestly believe in the 9/11 commission are so brainwashed that they just laugh at suggestions of an inside job and therefore dont spend hours of their time trying to defend the official story on youtube....now jog on and go collect ya pay packet..if we are so wrong what difference does it make to you?....

[kevin21122]

@sumrandomkid1 take your jenga game! and pour gasolind on the top 3rd portion and leave the rest un effected!!! and place a weight on top for good measure!! the jenga tower wont collapse , at worst you'll end up with a rectangular cube completely burning! you can even knock a section out and as long as the lower section is intact it wont collapse!!

[kevin21122]

@sumrandomkid1 Some people cant handel multiple variables! they are very easy too fool! Here is how!( person see's plane hit building) and then person see's building go down! person says how? Official says plane hit building and broke the building so building fell!! ( person says ok and thats it, another person says no thats not how it hapned! this confuses person1! he doesnt want to believe official lied! and he seen plane hit building fall and Official must be right!! THE END

[TruthMyMamaToldMe]

Could dude be more boring...I agree with his analysis, but he is a snoozer.

[fertilizerspike]

@pcuimac

Eat my ass. Bazant is a fucking cretin and so are you.

[pcuimac]

@fertilizerspike Just to informe you: I also question the validity of this so called "collapse theories". But arrogant people who come bullying others damage the "truth" movement. We have to argue with facts and mathemaical models not with name calling. Be polite or keep your mouth shut. I just told what we have to disproof if we want to win the argument. If we can´t publish an article that destroys Bazants arguments then we have lost. So leave me alone.

[fertilizerspike]

@pcuimac

Apparently you learned nothing about physics at university or you'd know how ignorant you appear when you spout such rubbish.

[pcuimac]

@fertilizerspike What are fucking physics? The only kind of physics you know of course! The physics I learned at university are about laws of nature and mathematics. By just calling names and shouting you will convince nobody. Just the opposite.

[fertilizerspike]

@pcuimac

You're a fucking imbecile. There was not enough energy in the upper 10 stories to demolish NINETY-TWO STORIES BELOW. Learn some fucking physics, retard.

[pcuimac]

@sequins91 Prof. Bazant has published 2 papers on that topic. If we want to proof anything we have to falsify them. Arguing on Youtube doesn´t further anything I fear. It´s just a war with words.

[pcuimac]

@TimothyRaymond1 NIST concluded the core colums buckled because of office fires. Prof. Bazant calculated the impact of the upper 10 stories of the building destroyed the lower 92 because nearly 8 stories buckled. The planes just ignited the fires and weakend the building around the impact zone, but without office fires they would not have collapsed.