@MakeSoapOutofKIKES Quite simply, Germans have more Slavic blood than Slavs have German. Berlin, the capital of Germany, is derived from the Slavic word "brljin", which means poor land. Otto von Bismarcks mother was a Slav, etc. Greetings.
according to your list seems slavs are superior to germanics then as prussians, saxons, bavarians & austrians with alot of slavic genes tend to be superior to western germans
germanics come from r1a cordedware people from poland / bellarus / ukraine who spread blonde hair, nordic phenotypes & indo-european languages to sweden.
in sweden the battle axe people became germanic.
but, some think germanic language happened when indo-europeans mixed with finno-ugrics
many say lithuanian is the most pure indo-european language actually.
but, byg genes lithuanians are between poles & finns
@bubibuLLo Thanks. Interesting data, which I admit is different from the one I possess. Does not matter. What matters is that so much Slavic history has been appropriated by others that now you have difficulty convincing people what the truth is. However, in the end we shall prevail, I am sure of it. Greetings brother.
Leo, Germans were different indoeuropean folk. The same were separate indoeuropean Slavs, Celts, Latins .. . All of them had and have common origin but during ages separated each from other. Prussians are Balts and Balts are nothing else just mix of Venet Slavs, Suebe Germans and UgroFinic Estons and Fins, what is proven by their languages, DNA, culture ...
Saxons, Bavarians, Danes ... were all originaly pure Germans, just during ages mixed with Slavs and somethimes even Slavs.
@bubibuLLo True, Germans and Slavs are completely different. According to data which I possess, Prussians, Saxons and Bavarians are germanized Slavs, while Danes are Vikingnized Slavs, ie. the Vikings turned them into Scandinavians. Do you agree ?
Vend - Goths during their invasion in 1th cent. a.c. into east of middle Europe ( from Gdansk, Visla .... to Dacia ) separated Venetian Slavs into today´s West and East Slavs.
The same separated Huns and Avars west Slavs from south Slavs in 5 - 8th cent.
Leo, Slavs couldn´t have been those Germanic tribes.
Germans are separate Indo-European tribe closest to Celts and Slavs.
Just some Germanic tribes ( Markomani, Quadi, Goths, Vandals .... ) were for sure mixed with autochthonous Venetian Slavs and in some periods they were Slavs presented under those names. But those German tribes were always Germans. Germans are not Slavs and Slavs are not Germans despite both closest.
@MrLeo751
germans do have more slavic blood than slavs do german blood that is true.
berlincomes from the polabian word for swamp
MakeSoapOutofKIKES 1 month ago
@MakeSoapOutofKIKES Quite simply, Germans have more Slavic blood than Slavs have German. Berlin, the capital of Germany, is derived from the Slavic word "brljin", which means poor land. Otto von Bismarcks mother was a Slav, etc. Greetings.
MrLeo751 1 month ago
@MrLeo751
according to your list seems slavs are superior to germanics then as prussians, saxons, bavarians & austrians with alot of slavic genes tend to be superior to western germans
MakeSoapOutofKIKES 1 month ago
@bubibuLLo
germanics come from r1a cordedware people from poland / bellarus / ukraine who spread blonde hair, nordic phenotypes & indo-european languages to sweden.
in sweden the battle axe people became germanic.
but, some think germanic language happened when indo-europeans mixed with finno-ugrics
many say lithuanian is the most pure indo-european language actually.
but, byg genes lithuanians are between poles & finns
MakeSoapOutofKIKES 1 month ago
@MrLeo751
AnViktJus 4 months ago in playlist Варяги - Vaeringjar
@bubibuLLo Thanks. Interesting data, which I admit is different from the one I possess. Does not matter. What matters is that so much Slavic history has been appropriated by others that now you have difficulty convincing people what the truth is. However, in the end we shall prevail, I am sure of it. Greetings brother.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751
Leo, Germans were different indoeuropean folk. The same were separate indoeuropean Slavs, Celts, Latins .. . All of them had and have common origin but during ages separated each from other. Prussians are Balts and Balts are nothing else just mix of Venet Slavs, Suebe Germans and UgroFinic Estons and Fins, what is proven by their languages, DNA, culture ...
Saxons, Bavarians, Danes ... were all originaly pure Germans, just during ages mixed with Slavs and somethimes even Slavs.
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo True, Germans and Slavs are completely different. According to data which I possess, Prussians, Saxons and Bavarians are germanized Slavs, while Danes are Vikingnized Slavs, ie. the Vikings turned them into Scandinavians. Do you agree ?
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@VendPrekmurec
Vend - Goths during their invasion in 1th cent. a.c. into east of middle Europe ( from Gdansk, Visla .... to Dacia ) separated Venetian Slavs into today´s West and East Slavs.
The same separated Huns and Avars west Slavs from south Slavs in 5 - 8th cent.
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@MrLeo751
Leo, Slavs couldn´t have been those Germanic tribes.
Germans are separate Indo-European tribe closest to Celts and Slavs.
Just some Germanic tribes ( Markomani, Quadi, Goths, Vandals .... ) were for sure mixed with autochthonous Venetian Slavs and in some periods they were Slavs presented under those names. But those German tribes were always Germans. Germans are not Slavs and Slavs are not Germans despite both closest.
bubibuLLo 5 months ago