Richard Dawkins Stumped By Creationists' Question
Loading...
Link to this comment:
Uploader Comments (SalvationEternity777)
Top Comments
-
Ah -I see. Evidence is futile. Only SE777's deductions count for anything.
Good luck with that.
1 year ago 2
All Comments (137)
-
@blueicemint22 First of all, i'd like to see the reference to those "facts (...) that he exists", and please don't quote the bible because it may not have been proven and therefore cannot be considered as facts. Secondly, of course you can't deny something that you don't know! But that is a fallacy. For example, you can't say that flying cows don't exist just because you never seen one, but that also doesn't mean they do exist!
-
Dawkins your stumped take a walk
-
athiest = someone who does not belive in god
-
it's funny Dawkins pronounces it "evilution" coincidence?
-
@Noisegator Ha that made me laugh, well said. Apologies you made this comment 6 months ago.
-
vERY GOOD question
-
vote rating
-
@blueicemint22 uh that's pretty much the dumbest comment i've ever seen... is that supposed to make me see the light and convert or something? seriously?
-
@MrCo312 yeah, you are an atheist... but who do you deny? facts still remains that He exists and you deny Him. Get to know Him first then that's the time you deny Him... you can't deny something you don't know. You are an atheist because you deny Him. Define ATHEIST and think it over.
If there were a god he'd smite me, then solve world hunger. To say that a magical man in the sky's existence is more plausible than that of undiscovered fossils is ludicrous. This video is irrelevant.
Hexethemex 1 year ago
@Hexethemex Why should God do as you please?
God created you, what right do you have to demand that everything be done in YOUR way?
SalvationEternity777 1 year ago 3