Russ Miller humanism undermines science-final.mp4
Uploader Comments (CreationMinistries)
All Comments (44)
-
"X decays into Z. Radiometric ages are based on how long Z took to form. A rock will date millions of years older if Z was in it when it formed"
The problem with your reasoning there is that many samples actually reject external incorporation of a daughter product. For instance zircon rejects incorporation of lead, but cannot reject the presence of lead from decay from uranium. There's also the fact that we know decay rates and can contrast parent to daughter percentage.
-
@CreationMinistries Lol Good job at answering his question. I guess you just don't want to admit the lack of empirical data that supports any claims about creation.
-
@CreationMinistries So you still didn't answer what of his refutation was wrong. We are waiting Russ...
-
Ya know Russ I'm still waiting on that source for your claim of 14C being found in all layers.
-
It is hard for me to accept anything this man says when so many of the quotes he uses in his seminars are either take out of context or complete fabrications. He also takes portions of seminars from other creationists and passes them off as his own (ie Kent Hovind). Until I see some semblance of intellectual honesty i'm not going to believe a single word out of that man's mouth.
-
Don't stop posting Russ, your bumbling and lack of on-camera confidence is as funny as any Ray Comfort skit.
-
Wow... the very living image of a conman.
-
This will be the third and last of your ridiculous videos that I watch, but for future reference, you look silly glancing back and forth between 3 cameras. I won't reference the scientific side of what I think of this video, but rather address the aesthetics. Ditch the Mr. Roger's set up, speak more naturally, and crop the camera in closer. Your highwaters are distracting. Pull your lights in a little closer and opt for a more neutral background.
Just a couple suggestions.
Viva la Evolución
There really is no such thing as creation or evolution 'science.' We can take actual science (things we can observe) & compare them to biblical accounts of creation or the flood, or we can take Darwinian predictions & compare those to real science. Darwinists hate to do this so stick to misleading statements & name-calling
CreationMinistries 5 months ago
Ah, so the reason that there is absolute zero evidence presented for creation 'science' is that it is censored by academia. So then, why don't they self publish? Why don't they make videos? I mean, I know creationists do these things but they are 100% (or nearly so) just supposed critiques of geology, cosmology, and biology rather than a shred of positive evidence for a young Earth or a creation event.
LithodidMan 5 months ago 3
@LithodidMan I actually took my time to watch your supposed refutation of what I reveal about Darwinism. What an utter waste of my time - I thought, perhaps you had SOMETHING worth me seeing - I was completely wrong. Still I must say thank you. I would have had to pay someone a couple grand to go through my info as you did. Good to know you found no errors worth mentioning
CreationMinistries 5 months ago
@CreationMinistries So which part of his refutation of your garbage was inaccurate?
Be specific.
TheScienceFoundation 5 months ago
@TheScienceFoundation I understand that when I expose your religious belief in goo-to-you evolutionism as non-scientific & impossible it upsets you. That is not my intention. My aim is to help open minded people and God has used me to reach thousands of misled individuals - Yes, I know that is even more disturbing to the Darwinian faithful, again, not my intention.
To answer your question & to be 'specific" - Start at 00:01 and watch the entire series.
CreationMinistries 5 months ago