9/11: EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY EXCLUSIVE - AE911Truth.org - Mark Basile Chemical Engineer

AE911Truth's EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW! Chemical Engineer Mark Basile - One of the scientists who found thermite in the World Trade Center dust discusses in depth his process of discovery using the scientific method.

This interview is some raw footage of one of the world class experts appearing in Architects and Engineer's upcoming hard hitting documentary
"9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out"

Preview the New AE911Truth.org 9/11 Documentary 2011 "9/11: Explosive Evidence -- Experts Speak Out":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIOC1J44RYw

Pre-Order the DVD September 1st 2011:
http://www.ae911truth.net/store/product_info.php?products_id=145

Buy the 9/11 Book "9/11 The Simple Facts":
http://www.ae911truth.net/store/product_info.php?products_id=143

Follow AE911TRUTH around the Web:
http://AE911truth.org/news-section/41-articles/544-eso-trailer.html
http://www.911ExpertsSpeakOut.org
http://www.AE911truth.org
http://www.BuildingWhat.org
http://www.Facebook.com/ae911truth
http://www.Twitter.com/ae911truth
http://www.Youtube.com/ae911truth
http://www.Flickr.com/ae911truth
http://www.AE911truth.net/store/
http://www.AE911truth.org/911investigator

AE911Truth.org 9/11 truth 911 pictures 9/11 photos 911 information 9/11 timeline 911 conspiracy 9/11 truth 911 facts 9/11 movies 911 movie documentary 9 11 documentary movie 911 conspiracy theories 9/11 conspiracy movie 911 conspiracy video AE911Truth.org

Mark Basile Mark Farrer Physicist thermite thermate nanothermite ae911truth 9/11 architect engineer high-rise demolition incendiaries explosive wtc wtc7 FEMA NIST controlled nanotechnology destruction "Experts Speak Out" 9 11 pictures photos information timeline conspiracy facts movies movie documentary theories video

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• mark
• basile
• Mark
• Farrer
• Physicist
• thermite
• thermate
• nanothermite
• ae911truth
• 9/11
• architect
• engineer
• high-rise
• demolition
• incendiaries
• explosive
• wtc
• wtc7
• FEMA
• NIST
• controlled
• nanotechnology
• destruction
• Experts Speak Out
• 911
• pictures
• photos
• information
• timeline
• conspiracy
• facts
• movies
• movie
• documentary
• theories
• video

[timhaas1]

Anyone else ever notice how Penn & Teller never attempt to debunk someone like this? Perhaps it's because you need more than some informal logical fallacies and ad hominem attacks to counter the claims of structural engineers, chemical engineers, and architects. Debunking clowns only eliminates the proposed gap between you and the clowns! Just saying... Penn & Teller are naught, but glorified clowns.

[Dionysos37]

So here it is. The U.S. wages a world-wide, "pre-emptive," permanent war across the entire planet (strike first before "they" strike you), and at the same time utterly refuses to come to even the most basic scientific (not political) understanding of what happened on 9/11, the central "reason" for this war and for the abandonment of Constitutional rights. You're going to hurt other people for your own secret reasons and you don't care why. If that isn't the definition of PSYCHOSIS, what is?

[Mogtepyigsoloth]

Sept 12, 2001 = (1/2) * (acceleration due to gravity) * [(time)squared] (2005)

Inertia never lies, but men do.

[Oldschooldan1]

Marvin left Securacom a year before the attack; that would mean the explosives were in the buildings for a year and no one noticed? You’ve debunked nothing.

[Oldschooldan1]

@Xendrius Sorry I don’t have time to watch your little video right now. Maybe tonight, I could use a good laugh and explosions don’t = explosives. Many things can explode in a fire. Again Securacom was never in charge of security. I don’t make things up, you can call the New York Port Authority and ask them, here is their #212 435-7000. They are in charge of security for WTC. Their headquarters was in Tower 1, they had 1400 people working in towers.

[Xendrius]

@Oldschooldan1 never in charge of WTC security? Good one, unlike the supporters of the official theory I don't make stuff up, not only was marvin Bush a key player, Wirt Walker who is related to the bush family through prescott bush's intermarriage, was also in charge, yes they had 1 year prior to 911 to make sure the explosives containers were brought inside.

[Xendrius]

@Oldschooldan1 7:33 in watch?v=i6eMq5Rit1w exactly how cutter charges sound, and then again later in the video you hear cutter charges on building 7, there were sirens everywhere and still the explosion is clear as water, not only that, EVERY single witness that was close enough said there was an rumble, followed by a huge explosion and then it sounded like a sounds of an implosion. You idiot, I just debunked everything you said with the use of video and witness evidence.

[Oldschooldan1]

Marvin Bush was never in charge of security for WTC. The PA was and has always been in charge. Marvin left the company your thinking of a year prior to the attacks. You may want to go back and do some editing on that video of yours.

[Oldschooldan1]

@Xendrius “Was silent” yes silent. Those special cutter charges of yours didn’t make any sound. The sound of 47 cutter charges going off would be heard on every video taken of the collapse. “Fire bombs” wow, your really stretching aren’t you. The fire bombs were protected by the core as well I suppose. You are aware that the core walls were made from light gauge metal studs and sheet rock. I could punch my hand thru it, what do you think an airplane would do?

[Xendrius]

@Oldschooldan1 Was silent? You are obviously braindead, impervious to impact of airliner? Ever heard of sealed containers tucked away naer the core? In my latest vid I show examples how they use fre bombs for special effects before detonating the cutter charges. Thanks to marvin bush on the inside they could get the operatives to place the charges during the night while noone was working, and that's according to former CIA asset Susan Lindauer, you are in the dark young one.

[Oldschooldan1]

@Xendrius I’m sure I don’t make sense to you; logic and deductive reasoning rarely make sense to your type. Good luck with your movie, I’m sure you will blow this whole thing wide open and bring to justice that secrete group of powerful individuals that were able plant super special explosive that was impervious to the impact of an airliner; was silent; was able to be planted with nobody being the wiser; to get us into a war for oil that we never received. You da man!

[Xendrius]

@Oldschooldan1 Haha the core stood strong by its own, minimize sway? You make no sense. Nevermind, I show how they blew up the towers, in my latest vid.

[Oldschooldan1]

@Xendrius A large section of the core was still standing; yes it was mangled, “showed signs of melting”? You must have really good eyes to tell that. “smoking white from the thermte” try dusty from thousands of pounds of pulverized gypsum and concrete. The core fell because it suffered massive damage to its foundations. Having 110 storeys fall on it has that effect. It was never meant to stand alone, it worked in conjunction with the perimeter column to minimize sway and shear.

[Xendrius]

@Oldschooldan1 It was not, it was mangled and showed signs of melting, it was smoking white from the thermte reaction, for some reason the explosives were powerful enough to make the floor trusses break off the core but parts of the core remained intact, but fear not, they had it packed with explosives at the lower floors that make every single core column fall in on itself.

Explain the implding core genius.

[Oldschooldan1]

@Xendrius again, the core was still standing after the collapse. It took 30 mins for the perimeter column to bow and snap. I thought termite burned quickly. The antenna did not drop first, that was an optical illusion. Video taken from the other side of the building clearly shows the perimeter columns failing prior to the antenna dropping.

[Xendrius]

@Oldschooldan1 How the hell can you make the vertical peremiter columns fail from external damage? The core columns were severed by explosives which is why the antenna dropped several feet before the rest.

They used thermite to weaken the core, which is why it made the peremiter columns bend a bit because of the extra pressure.

[Oldschooldan1]

@Xendrius Erm, no, the core was still standing after the collapse. The perimeter columns failed first.

[Xendrius]

@Oldschooldan1 Erm, no, it would have been placed near the core.

[Oldschooldan1]

If thermite was used, it would have had to of been place on the perimeter columns . It would have looked like the 4th of July around the entire tower not just one corner where the plane came to rest.

[Oldschooldan1]

The whole thermite debate is silly. The towers started their collapsed at the point of impact; thermite would have been blasted off the columns or ignited on impact by the planes. Video evidence clearly shows the perimeter columns bowing slowly over a 30 min period and then suddenly snapping. Thermite could not have caused the exterior columns to bow and snap. We know that the point of collapse started with the perimeter columns because the core columns were still standing after the collapse

[meeio442]

@x30xSabresFan Explain the pictures of the colums standing in a row with 45 degree angles in them? And you are completely wrong about thermite not used to take down building. You can google techinques they use to cut the steal support structures on a 45 degree angle so the colums slide causeing the buildings to collapse. You are either a troll for the Gov, or an idiot that believes what the news anf gov tells you. Like I'm going to believe a troll like you over 1500 engineers and scientists

[dpetrano]

This man is an American hero. 

[thisguyoverhere1]

@x30xSabresFan

Why do I have to convince you? I can't do that. We need an investigation that actually looks at the physical evidence. Why weren't explosives tested for? Why hasn't NIST released their computer model of WTC7? Why did they go with the fire hypothesis first, even though its the most unlikely cause of a perfect, free-fall implosion? Why did it take 13 months for Congress to even open an investigation, after most of the evidence was gone? If you can't see the problems here, idk.

[thisguyoverhere1]

6 of the 10 members of the 9/11 commission said that the commission was obstructed, specifically Senator Max Cleland and senior counsel John Farmer. Bush's counterterrorism expert Richard Clarke said that at least 50 CIA personnel knew about the coming attacks. Nano-thermite is much more energetic than regular marco thermite, and it can be applied as a sol-gel. Again, the American people are not responsible for perfectly accurate speculations on these matters; thats for a REALf investigation.